Craig Responds to My Objections to the Kalam Cosmological Argument

Craig Responds to My Objections to the Kalam Cosmological Argument March 28, 2014

In my debate on the existence of God with Phil Fernandes, Fernandes defended the kalam cosmological argument. In my rebuttal, I provided objections. William Lane Craig, who so far has not debated me despite saying over a decade ago that he would so, responded to me on YouTube.

William Lane Craig’s response is not new; it was released on October 12, 2009. I just became aware of it today (March 27, 2014), however, thanks to Diego Vera.

"Yes. I will address the natural law argument when I'm finished with the argument from ..."

Leviticus and Homosexuality – Part 10: ..."
"Would you like to address the natural law argument against homosexuality? That doesn't invoke scripture. ..."

Leviticus and Homosexuality – Part 10: ..."
"One view is that Leviticus proscribes male-male incest where male-female incest is proscribed.Also that it ..."

Leviticus and Homosexuality – Part 10: ..."

Browse Our Archives