Index: Draper’s Evidential Argument from Pain and Pleasure

Index: Draper’s Evidential Argument from Pain and Pleasure December 7, 2014

The purpose of this page is to provide an index for my blog series on Paul Draper’s classic 1989 article defending an evidential argument from evil which focuses on the biological role (and apparent moral randomness) of pain and pleasure.

  • Part 1: summarizes key terminology for the argument, as well as the argument itself.
  • Part 2: summarizes the first part of Draper’s argument, which purports to show that facts about pain and pleasure are more probable on the hypothesis of indifference (HI) than on theism (T).
  • Part 3: summarizes Draper’s refutation of three theodicies which might be used to defeat the first half of his argument
  • Part 4: summarizes Draper’s own views on the evidential significance of his argument, as well as reasons for thinking it will be very difficult for theists to offset the evidence about pain and pleasure.

See also:

"When I gave the example of "changeless" I meant in the sense that the thing ..."

The Possible Worlds Argument
"By now it's pretty obvious God mostly wanted empty space and dark matter."

Do We Need a Finely-Tuned God?
""The reason for believing it's not possible is that it's equivocal! Or at least, "a" ..."

The Possible Worlds Argument
"This depends on what we take "classical theism" to entail. Most philosophers use the term ..."

The Possible Worlds Argument

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment