Index: Draper’s Evidential Argument from Pain and Pleasure

Index: Draper’s Evidential Argument from Pain and Pleasure December 7, 2014

The purpose of this page is to provide an index for my blog series on Paul Draper’s classic 1989 article defending an evidential argument from evil which focuses on the biological role (and apparent moral randomness) of pain and pleasure.

  • Part 1: summarizes key terminology for the argument, as well as the argument itself.
  • Part 2: summarizes the first part of Draper’s argument, which purports to show that facts about pain and pleasure are more probable on the hypothesis of indifference (HI) than on theism (T).
  • Part 3: summarizes Draper’s refutation of three theodicies which might be used to defeat the first half of his argument
  • Part 4: summarizes Draper’s own views on the evidential significance of his argument, as well as reasons for thinking it will be very difficult for theists to offset the evidence about pain and pleasure.

See also:

"Good point, I never thought of the relationship between these arguments that way before. But ..."

When Are Appeals to Human Ignorance ..."
"Still bogged down with "real" work. I should finally have time tomorrow (3/22) to post ..."

Do We Need a Finely-Tuned God?
"Ron,Perhaps I should have said that "infinitesimal" probability does not mean impossibility. Infinitesimal probability is ..."

Do We Need a Finely-Tuned God?
"I agree; to say that God does not conform to logic does give him a ..."

The Possible Worlds Argument

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment