Links: Two Metaethical Arguments for Atheism from John J Park

Links: Two Metaethical Arguments for Atheism from John J Park January 4, 2019

Park, John. “The Moral Epistemological Argument for Atheism.” European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 7, no. 1 (n.d.): 121. doi:10.24204/EJPR.V7I1.133.

Abstract: Numerous supposed immoral mandates and commands by God found in religious texts are introduced and discussed. Such passages are used to construct a logical contradiction contention that is called the moral epistemological argument. It is shown how there is a contradiction in that God is omnibenevolent, God can instruct human beings, and God at times provideus with unethical orders and laws. Given the existence of the contradiction, it is argued that an omnibenevolent God does not exist. Finally, this contention is defended from several objections.

Park, John Jung. “The Problem of Error: The Moral Psychology Argument for Atheism.” Erkenntnis, n.d. doi:10.1007/S10670-017-9900-8.

Abstract: The problem of error is an old argument for atheism that can be found in Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy. Although it is not widely discussed in the contemporary literature in the Philosophy of Religion, I resurrect it and give it a modern spin. By relying on empirical studies in moral psychology that demonstrate that moral judgments from human beings are generally susceptible to certain psychological biases, such as framing and order effects, I claim that if God is responsible for making human beings such that we have these biases, this means that God is not a perfect being. The findings in empirical moral psychology create a problem for the existence of God, traditionally conceived.

"The further confirmation is from this comment by Joe Hinman:Any idea can be an argument. ..."

The Swoon Theory is a THEORY ..."
"Joe has no interest in defending Kreeft. I don't blame him because Kreeft wouldn't recognize ..."

Defending the Swoon Theory – Part ..."
"You are further CONFIRMING my assertion that you don't understand what an argument is. The ..."

The Swoon Theory is a THEORY ..."
"I didn't say he isn;t componentOn the contrary, you said:he can't understand doctoral level thinkingWhether ..."

The Swoon Theory is a THEORY ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


TRENDING AT PATHEOS Nonreligious
What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment