US Catholics angry at Boys Scouts … and Donald Trump

US Catholics angry at Boys Scouts … and Donald Trump February 6, 2017

Last year, Joe Maldonado, above right, an 8-year-old transgender boy from New Jersey was barred from his local Cub Scout pack because the Boy Scouts of America refused to recognise his gender identity.
But last month the BSA, to its credit, changed its admittance policy and said they would allow him to return.
The Archdiocese of St Louis was just as appalled by the move as the US Conference of Catholic Bishops were when they learned that Trump had no plans to ditch an Obama executive order that protects LGBT people.

But first, reaction to the BSA.
The Archdiocese of St Louis, according to this report, said it is “deeply saddened and disturbed” by the BSA’s announcement that the organisation will allow transgender youth into its programmes.
The archdiocese – no stranger to clerical child abuse – put out a statement saying that such action is contrary to the organisation’s dedication to honour, service and “duty to God” by allowing:

Girls struggling with gender dysphoria into their troops.

Allowing transgender children to identify as boys is:

Failing to recognise the fundamental order of God’s creation. The fact is that human beings are born with a sexual identity and not merely a ‘gender identity’ of one’s choosing. This sexual identity affects the totality of the person in the unity of his or her body and soul, and it greatly affects one’s capacity to love and be loved.

The archdiocese said it was “evaluating the effect” the new policy would have on troops affiliated with the church and:

Continue to be in dialogue with Boy Scouts of America in hopes that they will recognise their error and rededicate themselves to serving the needs of the boys in the organisation.

It added that, while the Boy Scouts have for years been an organisation that could be trusted with “the formation of our youth, this policy directive is the latest in a troubling pattern of behavior exhibited by the Boy Scouts of America. It is clear that as they move in the ways of the world they are becoming increasingly incompatible with our Catholic values.”
Earlier, the US bishops  said they were concerned by the Trump administration’s decision to maintain a “troubling” Obama-era executive order that could demand federal contractors violate their religious beliefs on marriage and gender ideology.

In seeking to remedy instances of discrimination, it creates new forms of discrimination against people of faith. Keeping the executive order intact is not the answer. The Church steadfastly opposes all unjust discrimination, and we need to continue to advance justice and fairness in the workplace. Executive Order 13672, however, creates problems rather than solves them.

Signed by President Barack Obama, the order prohibits federal government contractors from sexual orientation and gender-identity discrimination and forbids gender-identity discrimination in the employment of federal employees.
The executive order immediately drew criticism for its lack of religious exemptions. Religious groups voiced concern that they could be disqualified from federal contracts if their faith forbids them to affirm same-sex unions as marriages or to pay for employees’ transgender “transition” surgeries.
On January 31, the Trump White House affirmed its support for Obama’s order.
The executive order signed in 2014, which protects employees from anti-LGBTQ workplace discrimination while working for federal contractors, will remain intact at the direction of President Donald J Trump.
It added that President Trump is “proud” to have been the first Republican presidential nominee to:

Mention the LGBTQ community in his nomination acceptance speech, pledging then to protect the community from violence and oppression.

And that the President is:

Determined to protect the rights of all Americans, including the LGBTQ community.

“But, but, but …”, wailed the Bishops:

The executive order is an anomaly … containing no religious-liberty protection.

"They have had 2,000 years working through their views. While still "working" they were torturing ..."

No gay marriage here: faith-based wedding ..."
"White as a symbol of sexual purity is a whole different kettle of rotten fish ..."

No gay marriage here: faith-based wedding ..."
"Some idiot shouted heil hitler and gave the Nazi salute at a performance at Fiddler ..."

UK man who gave a Nazi ..."
"Wonder if they would have shown photos of my parents at the time, an interracial ..."

No gay marriage here: faith-based wedding ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • Daz

    Roman Catholicism: noun:
    An unhealthy obsession with other people’s sex lives and genitalia
    See also: evangelical protestantism

  • Broga

    Extraordinary! The Catholic Bishops, embracing, supporting but not necessarily practising, that greatest of perversions, celibacy, rushes to demand what they decide is acceptable coitus. At the same time their church has an unsurpassed record of protecting priests who sexually abuse children – boys and girls.

  • L.Long

    But the BSA as a whole still are a bunch of bigots when it comes to atheists. Although as individual troops they are much better about many things. And why not have “scouts”? Oh! Right! Because the xtian ahole parents teach boys and girls to fear each other and to leer at each other instead of accepting each other.

  • The BSA is welcome to revert to a private organization, reject federal and state funding, and preserve any membership policy they prefer. For better and for worse, this is the law in the United States. For instance, membership in Prince Hall Masonry is reserved exclusively for adult black men. No women, no white men, no Asian men, no Latino men, no young people.

  • 1859

    How long will it take for these religious clowns to realise that they have no moral or legal rights at all to pontificate about children’s or anyone else’s sexual identity. If they preach celibacy then they know fuck all about sexual identity. If they molest and rape children they are criminals of the worst kind – s why should we allow these ‘celibate’ paedophiles to pass judgements about what their booby-in-the-heavens says is the ‘right’ and ‘wrong’ sexuality? Give me a break…

  • Matt

    OT Sorry. But did you hear Evette Cooper, Labour Chair of the Home Affairs Committee, on BBC R4 Today.
    She was backing up the view of the “Neutral” John Bercow about a Trump State Visit to the uk. She said that Trump must not be allowed to speak in Westminster Hall because that is reserved for people like the Queen, Mr Ex President Obama and, get this, the fucking Pope. The head of the biggest global Crime Syndicate deeply involved in Child Rape, Child Trafficking, Mysogeny, Money Laundering, Embezzlement, Genocide, propagation of Aids, and promotion of “out of control” population growth and abject poverty, interference in the democratic process in countries all over the world and many other crimes. That someone can claim that the pope is a paragon of virtue on the Flagship News programme of the BBC unchallenged is a national disgrace. I think an apology is needed from Mrs Cooper. And she should note that Trump was democratically elected and as such represents the USA.
    You can catch it on BBC iPlayer at 2hr 35minute in.

  • remigius

    Matt. If Trump wants do deliver a speech during his visit he should do so in Hyde Park. There is an area right next to the Marble Arch that would be ideal.

  • Matt

    regimus … you missed the point I think.

  • remigius

    Nope. I merely addressed the prelusion of your comment rather than the conclusion.

  • John the Drunkard

    While I agree that Big Cheeto has no reason to expect a platform in Parliament, I’m sure we can come up with a list of others, who HAVE spoken there to the embarrassment of decent people everywhere.
    Still a tangent though. The BSA has straddled Church/State separation for far too long. Its ties with the Mormons, and the RCC are not acceptable, and represent an abdication of any claim at being ‘of America.’