N Ireland priest resigns over association with a paedophile

N Ireland priest resigns over association with a paedophile March 5, 2018

Dr John McAreavey, Catholic Bishop of Dromore, above, has resigned ‘with immediate” effect after it came to light that he celebrated Mass alongside a priest he knew was a paedophile.
His departure, according to lawyer Claire McKeegan:

Has brought to the surface yet another paedophile priest who was never investigated or exposed by the church or the police.

She was referring Fr Malachy Finnegan, now dead, who was accused of sexual abuse by 12 people.

Malachy Finnegan served as President of St Colman’s College in Newry
Bishop McAreavey said:

Following media reports which have disturbed and upset many people in the diocese and further afield, I have decided to resign with immediate effect. I shall make further comment in due course.

Finnegan is also allegedly linked to a catalogue of physical and emotional abuse against pupils. He died in 2002.
Amnesty International has called for a public inquiry into clerical sex abuse. Amnesty’s Northern Ireland Director Patrick Corrigan said:

To date, clerical abuse victims here have been let down, not just by the church, but also by the authorities.

McKeegan who represents a number of Finnegan’s alleged victims, said she had received calls from numerous further witnesses since a settlement by one of her clients was made public recently.
She added:

The message is clear: victims demand a public inquiry into clerical abuse in Northern Ireland without any further delay.
The victims and survivors deserve to speak about the horrific abuse that took place and be heard in a public forum tasked with sufficient powers to get to the truth.

Meanwhile, it is reported here that the UK’s Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse heard today (Monday) that abuse thrived in the Anglican Church due to clerical naivety about exploitation risks and an “excessive emphasis” on forgiving predators.
The inquiry was told that young victims were often made to feel responsible for their experiences when they reported concerns to church staff.
Public hearings are taking place this week examining how the Church of England handled allegations of sexual misconduct stretching back to the 1950s, first focusing on the Diocese of Chichester.
Fiona Scolding QC, above, the lead lawyer for the Anglican strand of the inquiry, set out the potential problems within the church that will be highlighted by witnesses and documents during a fortnight of hearings.
They include the church prioritising reputational concerns over the safety of children when allegations against the clergy came to light.
Abuse victims from the Diocese of Chichester in the 1950s and 1960s will give evidence, as well as those who were preyed upon in the 1990s during a scandal which:

Engulfed the diocese in the first decade of the 21st century.

The Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby will be among those appearing before the probe on behalf of the church.
Scolding said in her opening statement:

The church is the established church of England – the national church. It is a very important and powerful institution within our society. It provides spiritual sustenance for many and is seen as a leader in terms of not just religious questions, but related questions of social justice and ethics.
Its management of allegations of child sexual abuse reflect not just society’s difficulties in coming to terms with it, but also how even institutions dedicated to good can both harbour individuals who are malign but also be institutionally incapable of effective responses to concerns about the sexual abuse of children.

Problems uncovered by the inquiry also included:

A culture of excessive deference to those at the top of the hierarchy and an unwillingness to challenge them.

Evidence suggested that clerical figures suffered from an “inability” to spot grooming, believe holy men were capable of harming young people or understand those abused as children could suffer long-lasting damage.
Scolding added there was:

An excessive emphasis upon forgiveness, which allowed individuals to go without justice and for individuals who complained of abuse feeling isolated if they did not ‘forgive’ their abuser.

The Church of England for years lacked meaningful child protection measures, was beset by a “culture of amateurism” and was sluggish in responding to criticism, she told the inquiry. Scolding said the church:

Was an institution which, unsure of itself and its role within the late twentieth century, was frightened of criticism from outside, and which preferred to put its own reputation as an institution above the need to safeguard children.

Church figures including former Bishop of Lewes Peter Ball have been convicted of abusing numerous children within the Diocese of Chichester.
Clergy figures accused of sexual offences against children were repeatedly allowed to keep close ties to the church, the inquiry heard.
Several of those arrested continued playing an active part in religious life, including Reverend Robert Coles, who was arrested in 1997 but performed more than 100 services at a parish in East Sussex between 1998 and 2002.
No-one at the parish knew of his past, it was heard, and he is alleged to have sexually groomed a child between 2007 and 2008.

The Bishop of Lewes at the time, Wallace Benn, above, had accompanied Coles to the police station when he was arrested, Scolding said, adding:

It is accepted that the senior clergy, including the Archdeacon of Lewes, the Bishop of Lewes and the Bishop of Chichester, as well as the diocesan safeguarding advisor knew of this arrest.

Coles had even met with church figures including Bishop Benn before his arrest and retirement in 1997 and admitted to sexual activity with children, described as “buggery” or “inappropriate fondling”.
He was not placed on any list for clergy that have acted in an unfit manner and was permitted to continue at his ministry until retirement.
Benn was cleared of wrong-doing by a church inquiry in 2013.
In 2012, Coles pleaded guilty to charges of indecent assault and buggery against three boys aged between 10 and 16 in the late 1970s and early 1980s and was sentenced in February 2013 to 8 years imprisonment.
In this report, about the “willful blindness” of the C or E, Richard Scorer, speaking on behalf of many of the victims, said:

If you want to abuse children there is no more effective way of terrifying and silencing your victims than to claim to have God on your side. The inquiry will look into how abuse by people associated with Chichester Cathedral was dealt with.
The Church of England claims to offer moral guidance to the country yet clerical sexual abuse cases powerfully undermine the claim. This leads to the cover-up of abuse.
The question is whether the Church of England can be trusted to put its own house in order.

Hat tip: BarrieJohn (Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse report)

"Here's another one in case you haven't seen it yet:https://friendlyatheist.pat...Completely stark, staring bonkers!"

Brexit is God’s plan to crush ..."
"I think the citation that refers more accurately to POTUS 45, Jim Bakker, and all ..."

Donald Trump was sent by God ..."
"We used to visit Islay (Queen of the Hebrides) and enjoy tasting sessions. The peat ..."

Kristallnacht: Muslims extremists scream ‘death to ..."
"I think that is unfair. They should be giving the churches money to pay for ..."

New US tax law could extract ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • Broga

    “The question is whether the Church of England can be trusted to put its own house in order”.
    The other question is whether it wants to. Or will it prefer to continue to go through the motions and offer the victims nothing more than the usual religious patter.

  • Robster

    Why is this organisation in a position for others to wonder if it/they’ll behave properly, even legally, morally? If there’s crime detected, why the hesitance to investigate and prosecute?

  • RIchardW

    I challenge Ms Scolding’s assertion that many people look to the CofE as a moral leader. Apart from its members, does anyone now view it in that light? I rather doubt it.

  • Henri

    As far as I can see the CoE is mainly a business with an impressive investment portfolio, enormous property holdings, weilding political power way beyond the number of people it represents, deeply embedded in all aspects of society and is more interested in claiming the mineral rights under vast tracts of the country than facing up or owning up to about anything to do with the sexual abuse of children. Well its just about to go tits up because the tactic of keeping a low profile and letting the RCC take virtually all the blame for child rape, is about to come unstuck. No doubt there are thousands of officials behind palace walls, inside Oxbridge colleges, in government ministries, at the Bar all working away frantically to play everything down and limit the damage. But the cracks are showning and credibility rapidly draining away.

  • L.Long

    Very moral dude, resigns AFTER being caught being an ahole enabler of some criminal. Speaks loads on his REAL sense of morality! And we already knew he was basically a liar, as he wears the LIAR4jesus costume, the funny hat is a dead give away!

  • robert

    Christianity is evil in all it’s forms because of it’s teaching to forgive sins with out any responsibility to society. ban all religions now