Banned Bible classes: retirement home accused of hostility to religion

Banned Bible classes: retirement home accused of hostility to religion October 15, 2018

Hardly a week goes by without the media reporting on Christians being ‘persecuted’ by nasty secular organisations or institutions.

Latest of these reports concerns Bible study classes held at Evergreens, a Virginia-based retirement community, by an elderly couple – Kenneth and Liv Hauge – who were told in a notice issued earlier this year by the Community Realty Company that their classes:

Caused, and continues to cause, serious and substantial disturbances with other residents in the community.

Kenneth Hauge

The notice included allegations that the weekly study involved “operating an unauthorized business” and “interfering with other residents’ use of the community facilities”.

And it added:

Landlord has received a series of complaints over the past several months regarding your conduct at the community. Landlord has also learned that you show religious films on Sunday evenings, followed by a group discussion on the religious film. This activity has resulted in complaints to Landlord similar to those related to the Bible study class.

The couple, faced with eviction if they refused to stop the classes, caved in and quit their silly and intrusive Christian posturing.

But now, with the aid of an outfit called First Liberty Institute – a bunch of professional shit-stirrers playing at being lawyers – they have lodged a “discrimination” complaint with the US Department of Housing and Urban Development.

First Liberty claims that:

CRC and Evergreens’ actions violate the Fair Housing Act and its accompanying regulations. The totality of CRC and Evergreens’ treatment of the Hauges, the notice, and the policy manifest both discriminatory intent and discriminatory impact relating to the Hauges’ continued rental of a dwelling and access to the common facilities related to it, thus violating the FHA’s prohibitions against religious discrimination in housing.

Lea Patterson, associate counsel for First Liberty, said in a statement released last Thursday that she considered the treatment of the Hauges to be “shameful.”

It is both shameful and illegal to threaten elderly residents with eviction simply for holding a Bible study. Treating residents unequally simply out of hostility to religion violates federal law and taints Virginia’s long history of religious freedom.

Hauge, a semi-retired Lutheran minister has lived at Evergreens with his wife since January 2017.

If they win their case the couple have vowed to restart their classes.

"The Eurovision mission to Europe don't tell me this is the moron responsible for the ..."

Brexit is God’s plan to crush ..."
"Hmm, not sure I like the idea of denying aid to the people that need ..."

Faith-based homophobia has just cost Tanzania ..."
"It must really bite to be stupid enough to take him seriously."

Donald Trump was sent by God ..."
"Even those British who voted for Brexit are for the most part not dumb enough ..."

Brexit is God’s plan to crush ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • zenlike

    If the eviction notice is correct (of course to be established in court), this should be an easy case, which has nothing to do with religious freedom or alleged persecution: these people have basically been running a church, even with outside members, in the communal facilities which are there for the use of ALL residents. As usual, this seems to be the case of christians asking for privileges above and beyond the rights of others, and whine about persecution when they are asked to play by the same rules as everyone else.

  • Broga

    ” and whine about persecution when they are asked to play by the same rules as everyone else.” That is what they can’t accept. Archbishop of Canterbury slavering over Harry’s missus getting pregnant. Why? Daily Mirror, a supposedly socialist newspaper wetting itself when Air Miles Andy gets emotional. The homeless on the streets removed like human trash so that they won’t offend the eyes of the royals and the freeloaders turning up.

  • Aloha

    There was an article about this on the Christian Post — even those readers recognized it as a simple case of the misuse of facilities.

  • zenlike

    If it’s the article linked to in this post, sadly only one person out of the five commenting is making the case this is simply christian privilege and misuse of the facilities, the four others are privileged whiners.

    (Edited to add one commenter I apparently missed.)

    Edited to add: in another Christian Post article about the same subject, only 3 comments, Of which 2 privileged whiners.

  • Prosecution complex as usual. Nothing new under the Sun.

  • barriejohn

    This should make you smile:

    Not the first time that McCoy has reacted in that way, either!