Tasmanian judge rules against Christian’s ‘vicious’ anti-gay flyers

Tasmanian judge rules against Christian’s ‘vicious’ anti-gay flyers October 6, 2018

Tasmanian gay rights activist, Rodney Croome, above, has welcomed a court ruling against a Christian who breached the Australian island state’s Anti-Discrimination Act.

According to this report, the Supreme Court denied the appeal of Launceston man James Durston who distributed “vicious” anti-LGBTI flyers in 2013.

Justice Michael Brett rejected Durston’s appeal, finding that the sections of Tasmania’s Anti-Discrimination Act that prohibit incitement to hatred and offensive language do not impinge on religious freedom or free speech, and are constitutionally valid.

Croome said the decision shows Tasmanian law strikes the right balance between upholding free speech and preventing hate speech.

Today’s decision is very important because it puts the bed the long-term question, raised in almost all previous Tasmanian hate speech cases, about whether the state’s hate-speech laws breach freedom of speech and freedom of religion, and whether they are constitutional.

Justice Brett has put forward a careful, rigorous and unassailable argument that freedom of religion and freedom of speech are not unfettered rights, and that the Tasmanian Anti-Discrimination Act strikes the right balance between these rights and right of citizens to live free from hate and vilification.

I urge state and federal governments heed this decision and back away from any attempts to water down laws that have helped make Tasmania a more inclusive and cohesive society.

The flyers distributed by Durston – “a spokesman for God” – began with the sentence:

It is warned that homosexuality should not be tolerated, and therefore this will benefit both the individual and society.

Other claims included that lesbians were 307 times more likely to die in accidents than white women aged 25-44, while gay men were 10 times more likely to die in accidents.
It suggested just eight per cent of gay men live to old age compared to just a quarter of lesbians.

Robert Williams, the Hobart man who lodged the original anti-discrimination complaint against Durston, said the decision showed Tasmania is on the forefront of combating the rise of anti-LGBTI hate speech.

This decision reinforces my pride in being Tasmanian because Tasmania is leading the nation when it comes to protecting citizens from hate speech.

The protection offered by our laws and our courts promotes inclusion, mature political debate, and respect between all citizens regardless of who we are.

"It is your choice to feel superior and condescending. That is all you and your ..."

Callous priest used teen’s funeral to ..."
"Um, no, understanding someone was killing himself rather than endure deterioration of body and mind, ..."

Callous priest used teen’s funeral to ..."
"Can you prove any gods exist, or not?"

Callous priest used teen’s funeral to ..."
"Get off the dope and save what is left of your sorry mind."

Callous priest used teen’s funeral to ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • kaydenpat

    Not only are the claims hateful. They’re also bollocks.

  • Die Anyway

    > “…lesbians were 307 times more likely to die in accidents…, while gay men were 10 times more likely to die in accidents.”

    I can’t imagine that this is remotely true but, for the sake of discussion, let’s say that it is. Why would this make it ok to discriminate against citizens who belong to these groups? At the very least it should inspire greater compassion.

  • zenlike

    It is also a very weird (and invalid) comparison, comparing lesbians of all age groups and all races with a specific age group and race, so it looks like an extremely cherry-picked number, a number more influenced with the other factors in play (specifically age is a very influential factor in accident statistics). Eg, our little bigot is being extremely dishonest. What always strikes me: if they truly believed they were right, why would they feel the need to constantly lie and be dishonest?

  • Vanity Unfair

    Data mining: I have rarely seen such flagrant perversion of statistics.
    Hi ho!

  • mobathome

    A quick google did not find Justice Brett’s judgement. Cloud someone please help me find this?

  • Mark Palmer

    I just used the search terms of “Tasmanian judge rules against Christian” and got several hits from many different news outlets. Using Google in the United States.

  • Jim Jones


  • kaydenpat

    Yes that.,


    sorry jeebus freaks-aint your world no mo!