Op-ed: Ex-Muslims – a community in protest

Op-ed: Ex-Muslims – a community in protest July 21, 2019

When the Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain (CEMB) started 11 years ago in June 2007, we were hard pressed to find 25 people who would come out publicly to break the apostasy taboo, writes Maryam Namazie.

Today, we are witness to an international ex-Muslim “community” – a tsunami of atheism.

For me, though, this has never been about community as identity politics (people boxed into homogenised, segregated communities with culturally-relative rights managed by “community leaders”).  But rather, a community in protest: insisting on freedom from religion and the right to conscience. For the right to apostasy and blasphemy without fear.

Like the LGBT, anti-slavery, anti-colonialist, anti-apartheid, suffragette or civil rights movements, it’s a movement that insists on our common humanity and equality – not difference or superiority.

A movement of people who refuse to live in fear and in the shadows. And who are speaking out for social change in unprecedented ways, particularly via social media.

This movement matters because thirteen states punish atheism with the death penalty – all Islamic.

• Because a series of laws in Saudi Arabia define atheism as terrorism with Ahmad Al-Shamri being sentenced to death for atheism.

• Because Sina Dehghan has been sentenced to death in Iran for “insulting Islam.”

• Because a Pakistani High Court Judge has said that blasphemers are terrorists with Ayaz Nizami and Rana Noman facing the death penalty.

• Because the Egyptian government is producing a national plan to “confront and eliminate” atheism. Because atheist blogger Sherif Gaber has not been seen in public since his arrest at Cairo airport on 2 May.

• Because a Malaysian government minister has said that atheists should be “hunted down” and “re-educated.”

• Because even in secular societies, ex-Muslims can be shunned, ostracised, and face honour-related violence…

• Because even in countries without the death penalty, like Bangladesh, Islamists kill atheists whilst the government turns a blind eye.

image via Twitter

• Because atheist poet and publisher Shahzahan Bachchu, above, was dragged out of a shop and shot dead mid-June this year.

This movement matters because you can be killed for leaving or criticising Islam.

Full stop.

Reason enough.

The Saudi UN Ambassador Abdallah Al-Mouallimi says advocating atheism is a terrorist offence as it leads to chaos and is dangerous. Absurdly, the Guardian‘s David Shariatmadari agrees that “criticism of religion, Islam especially, can be antisocial, even dangerous.”

These accusations are not new.

The suffragettes, for example, were considered dangerous, subversive, destroying the “natural” order of things. They were also labelled anti-male and traitors for demanding the right to vote during war time.

Similarly, ex-Muslims are often labelled traitors or “native informants.” After all, when one homogenises a “community,” anyone who steps outside of their assigned place will be deemed a traitor, a subversive and a danger to the “natural” order of things.

Like other social and political movements fighting for equality, the ex-Muslim movement is considered “dangerous” for this very reason – that it subverts the status quo – and not because of some paternalistic concern for “one’s” minorities.  After all, don’t minorities also have the right to dissent, to equality, to civil rights and freedoms?

And why is blasphemy or apostasy considered “Muslim-bashing”? Is promoting LGBT rights, “straight-bashing” or promoting women’s right to vote, “male-bashing”?

Ex-Muslims at last year’s London Pride. Image via YouTube

Yet when CEMB took to the streets of London Pride last year, the East London Mosque filed a complaint against our “Islamophobic” placards; it took Pride London eight long months to meet with CEMB and allow us back this year. (Imagine if the Westboro Baptist Church had filed a complaint with Pride against a group that was critical of Christianity and the Christian-Right. Would it take eight months for them to decide whose side they were on?)

Yet when #ExMuslimBecause became viral overnight with over 120,000 Tweets from 65 countries with so many realising they were not alone for the first time in their lives, BBC Trending said it was an excuse for “Muslim-bashing” and “Islamophobia.”

Yet when we showed our solidarity with those persecuted in Saudi Arabia for eating or drinking during Ramadan, armed metropolitan police came to the Saudi Embassy’s rescue saying our “eat-in” and fast-defying solidarity action was “offending” those at the embassy

In my opinion, accusations of “Islamophobia” are less about opposing bigotry (after all you cannot stop racism by outlawing blasphemy and apostasy) and more about defending religious privilege and the status quo. It is used to scaremonger ex-Muslims into silence and impose de facto apostasy and blasphemy laws where none exist. Where they do, we are accused of blasphemy and apostasy and persecuted without any such “niceties.”

The charge of “Islamophobia” protects religion and the religious-Right, not believers. There is a clear difference between the term xenophobia, for example, in which people who are migrants are targeted or homophobia, where LGBT are targeted versus Islamophobia, where an idea is targeted. Religion is an idea; Islamism and the religious-Right are political movements. They must be open to unrelenting criticism.

Conflating criticism of Islam and Islamism with “Muslim-bashing” sees dissent as bigotry rather than for what it is – a defence of blasphemy and apostasy when one can be killed for it.

That doesn’t mean that bigotry against Muslims, migrants, minorities doesn’t exist. Of course it does. We live in class-based societies that profit from racism. Ex-Muslims and their families (many of whom are still Muslim) understand this better than most. We also face closed borders, travel bans, hate, violence and discrimination.

And, yes of course, there are ex-Muslims who are bigoted against Muslims just as there are Muslims who are bigoted against ex-Muslims; as there are women who are misogynists and men who are feminists … But individuals – not a “community” –  must be held accountable for their choices. We are not extensions of our “communities” to be defended or condemned depending on which “tribe” we belong to.

Victim blaming is the natural outcome of an unconditional defence of the “community” no matter what atrocities take place. (If only we had not offended, if only we had minded our manners … there would be no need to threaten, kill or silence us …)

Ironically, placing collective blame is also a natural outcome of identity politics, which moreover legitimises racist white identity politics. The argument that cultures are homogenous and need protection has aided the rise of xenophobia and anti-migrant sentiment. Trump uses this notion all the time as does far-Right groups like Pegida, Five Star Movement, For Britain and the English Defence League.

Like the murder of apostates, letting migrants drown in waters and separating toddlers from their parents at borders is the height of defending one’s “culture” versus the “invading hordes” – to hell with the human consequences.

Whilst touted as progressive, identity politics is a politics of difference AND superiority – these are two sides of the same double-edged sword. The politics of difference has always been the fundamental principle of a racist agenda, not the other way around – whether it is Nazism, the biological theory of difference and racial superiority or expressions of difference in cultural and religious terms.

Identity politics is the corruption of the fight for social justice by degrading it to a mere defence of culture and the homogenous “community” – no matter what.

Which is why when Goldsmiths Islamic Society tried to cancel and disrupt my talk, the LGBTQ+ and Feminist Societies sided with the ISOC against my “Islamophobia” – even after the ISOC President’s homophobic tweets came to light and he was forced to resign.

And it is why the Muslim LGBTQ charity Imaan has asserted our presence at Pride last year served only to “deepen divisions between communities” or why a Guardian piece by a gay Muslim accuses us of “Islamophobia” whilst defending the East London Mosque that is a centre of homophobia.

From the point of view of identity politics, it is better to defend the East London Mosque with its preachers calling for the death penalty for LGBT, than to be seen to side with “those ex-Muslims” defending the rights of Muslim AND ex-Muslim LGBT.

Identity politics ignores and vilifies dissent, political and social movements and class politics; it erases progressive voices and amplifies only the narrative of those in power because it is they who determine “authentic” community, culture and religion. Identity politics, therefore, doesn’t allow one to see one’s allies and enemies within and outside the “community.” It prevents people from mobilising real solidarity and seeing how our lives and rights are interlinked across “communities,” borders and boundaries.

In an age of regressive identity politics and cultural relativism, an ex-Muslim community in protest matters because it reaffirms universal values, anti-racism, secularism, the fight for equality, social justice and our common humanity.

A movement that is about equality not privilege. Rights without permission.  And gives no apologies.

Image via YouTube/CEMB

The Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain marched again at Pride in London in July. This year, we marked the 40th anniversary of the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence, a rebellion against the church’s religious morality, by marching as the Imams of Perpetual Indulgence.

Instead of being the Council for the Promotion of Virtue and the Prevention of Vice that terrorise people by enforcing Islamic morality codes with brute force in the countries some of us have fled from, we were the Council for the Promotion of Vice and the Prevention of Virtue.

• Maryam Namazie is spokesperson for the Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain. This piece is a shortened version of  her speech at the Muslimish Conference in New York City in June 2018.

"Contempt of court in the UK usually results in imprisonment and a criminal conviction."

Defiant headteacher says her illegal Islamic ..."
"Funnily enough, I suspect if Newman was still around he'd have boycotted the event too.Remember ..."

Ireland ‘forced’ to have an official ..."
"If this isn't a school then these kids aren't being educated. That's an offense that ..."

Defiant headteacher says her illegal Islamic ..."
"Of course they do. It's the old "protection" racket:1... Find a problem that someone else ..."

Catholic bishops in Kenya ‘erroneously’ promoted ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


TRENDING AT PATHEOS Nonreligious
What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • Callace

    Utterly awesome! It is imperative that we all understand that religious conservatives acts pretty much the same regardless of religion, and must be fought in the same way.

    Equality for all must mean that all PERSONS are equal, not just all identity groups. And it gets all the worse if the group is one you never even chose, but were born into and expected to stay in.

  • Jim Jones

    More proof that religion is tribalism!

  • Bubblecar

    Hearty applause for Maryam and the CEMB, keep up the excellent work.

  • Person223

    Many things are tribalistic.

  • Eric Jameson

    I wonder if there is an ex-gay community? Or are they considered apostates by gays?

  • CoastalMaineBird

    Gay is not a belief system. You is or you ain’t. It’s the Christian types who try to convert people from one to the other, out of sheer hatred, or out of fear of losing the numbers game (more of them = less of us).
    You don’t seem to realize that your delusions just don’t apply to everybody.

  • elropo

    I hope they will apply for a CCW permit, it sounds really dangerous to quit ISLAM…

  • Wisdom, Justice, Love

    I originally read this and didn’t know what to say.
    I still don’t.

    While I may face opposition, resentment and spite as a nonbeliever, I know I don’t face nearly as perilous environments as others. Any many will unfortunately be targeted. I can only hope the tide is turning and good fortune is closed for humanity. But I fear the worst is yet to come.

    But I know that love is strong. It may take different forms but is indestructible.
    And as a human learn to love his or her self, it broadens that individual’s perspective on life with other humans, and animals and buildings and beaches etc.

    Love is cherishing the good, and accepting the bad and being ok with it. The good should outweigh the bad, even if only by the thinnest of margins (in my case; I’m awful).

    And if you don’t know how to love yourself, how can you love anyone or anything?

    I really dislike this image of love being about getting everything you want, being catered to, Privileged. Love is truth and truth is complex. Fairy tales are simple: …and they lived happily ever after. Reality has nuance, and that’s one of the things that makes experiences great; many are very similar and nearly identical, but no two are the same.

    We are all brothers and sisters, believers and nonbelievers alike. Theists may not realized it yet.

    A day will come when we can let logic and reason build true compassion for all.