Feser vs Oppy: Can We “Prove” that God Exists?

Feser vs Oppy: Can We “Prove” that God Exists? December 15, 2019

In editing a book called The Unnecessary Science, I have been looking into natural law theory and Aristotelian-Thomistic philosophy. Here, natural law’s big modern proponent, Ed Feser (at whom the book is aimed as a critique) locks horns with Graham Oppy. My issue for such debates like this, that are very narrow and metaphysical in nature, is that they are (to me, granted) eliminatable with something like conceptual nominalism. I, personally, would have just taken issue with opening premises that include arguable ideas such as “potential”, as I did here and here. Indeed, it took 54 minutes to bring nominalism up.


Stay in touch! Like A Tippling Philosopher on Facebook:

A Tippling Philosopher

You can also buy me a cuppa. Please… It justifies me continuing to do this!

"Great Andromeda Galaxy. The gate is really narrow, especially with no loopholes."

The One Unforgiveable Sin
"I really, really. appreciate your confirmation of how stupid you are. That little bit about ..."

Using Common Sense to Not See ..."
"1. Pusssy grabbing.2.Trump University.3. Appointing unqualified and incompetent relations to government positions.4.Staying at his own ..."

To Golf Or Not To Golf, ..."
"Trump being far worse, right? Your whataboutery is getting even more pathetic."

To Golf Or Not To Golf, ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!