Pearced Off! #6 – Circularity of Believing the New Testament

Pearced Off! #6 – Circularity of Believing the New Testament April 17, 2020

I am running a series of the old podcast segments from my Pearced Off! section of the Skepticule Podcast (a British skepticism-based podcast now on hiatus) that I used to contribute to. Some of the earlier ones have some quieter audio. Apologies. They run at around ten minutes. Something to keep you company outside of Netflix and the news…

Please subscribe to my channel if you can be arsed. One day, I might get to 1000 subscribers when they allow monetisation. Until then, it’s a labour of love.

This one looks at a Christian requiring the Bible to undergird their faith, and having this as the evidence for their belief and theology, and yet belief in the claims of the Bible itself being based on fideism and not evidentialism.


Stay in touch! Like A Tippling Philosopher on Facebook:

A Tippling Philosopher

You can also buy me a cuppa. Please… It justifies me continuing to do this!

"Yes. The problem is that what the RCC holds as dogmatic is somewhat vague. Catechisms ..."

God: Responsible for the Good but ..."
"They're experts at convincing idiots like Otto they're good people."

Trump Strong on (Taking Money from) ..."
"Anti-Federalists came up with the idea. Federalists thought it was superfluous."

Dark Money and Selecting a Conservative ..."
"My mother made the same trip. She took a picture of the fire extinguisher sitting ..."

Moses’ Burning Bush

Browse Our Archives