This is from the American Humanist Association:
The American Humanist Association (AHA) joined with other secular organizations on a friend of the court brief, filed today with the Supreme Court of the United States in Ramirez v. Collier, dealing with the constitutionality of the death penalty and the religious free exercise rights of incarcerated persons.
“If the Supreme Court truly cares about religious freedom, it will end the anachronistic practice of capital punishment, which is sustained by fundamentalist Christian doctrine, as it is completely at odds with our country’s promise of civil liberty,” said AHA Legal Director and Senior Counsel Monica Miller. “Moreover, many Christians also oppose the death penalty on religious grounds and this case involves a Baptist petitioner,” Miller added with cautious optimism.
The brief argues that the Court should avoid the issue of whether Texas’s policy of disallowing spoken prayer and physical contact inside the execution chamber is permissible and rule that the death penalty is unconstitutional altogether.
Ramirez, convicted on murder charges in 2008, is currently serving a death sentence. He requested that his Baptist pastor be allowed to put his hands on Ramirez’s body and pray out loud while the lethal injection occurs. However, the state of Texas refused to grant his request. Presently, the law requires that a government entity demonstrate a compelling interest when burdening the right to freely exercise one’s religion, which Texas has not demonstrated. This case has broad implications for the Court’s treatment of the religious free exercise clause. After granting John Ramirez’s emergency application for a temporary stay of execution date earlier this month, the Court will hear Ramirez’s appeal this fall.
Today’s amicus brief, submitted by the Freedom From Religion Foundation and co-signed by the American Humanist Association and American Atheists, argues that the Court should hold that capital punishment, as a practice, is unconstitutional and Biblically-based. It also argues that state-sponsored executions violate one’s ability to freely exercise their religion and, if executions are allowed to take place, end-of-life accommodations must be made available to all.
“In the western world, the death penalty is a barbaric relic that often has been justified by religious scripture, and it has no place in modern society,” the brief explains. It continues later, “While the root source of capital punishment may not be solely biblical, in the western world that has been the sourcebook for the death penalty.”
“The AHA has long voiced our opposition to capital punishment”, comments AHA Deputy Director Nicole Carr. “We believe that the practice reflects a disregard for fundamental human rights and we strongly denounce it under all circumstances.”
Arguments in Ramirez v. Collier will be heard this October or November.
A copy of the amicus brief can be found here.
The American Humanist Association (AHA) works to protect the rights of humanists, atheists, and other nontheistic Americans. The AHA advances the ethical and life-affirming worldview of humanism, which—without beliefs in gods or other supernatural forces—encourages individuals to live informed and meaningful lives that aspire to the greater good of humanity.
Special thanks to the Louis J. Appignani Foundation for their support of the Appignani Humanist Legal Center.
Stay in touch! Like A Tippling Philosopher on Facebook: