Texas governor orders Bill of Rights display removed because it’s like “a crucifix immersed in a jar of urine.”

Texas governor orders Bill of Rights display removed because it’s like “a crucifix immersed in a jar of urine.” December 23, 2015

Andrew Seidel has documented a developing situation down in Texas.  First, some back story:

Last week, the Freedom From Religion Foundation put up our Bill of Rights display in the Texas State Capitol in Austin. We jumped through all the hoops and were granted permission to put up the display.

Here it is:

Hey, it’s the Statue of Liberty, perhaps the most recognizable emblem of our nation.  And around her are some of the founding fathers conservatives claim to love so much.  This should make everybody happy.

Ok, so we know Gov. Abbot is willing to lie about secular symbols and opposes them, but he swore an oath to uphold this secular symbol when he took office.  Plus, conservatives everywhere love to drone on about how much they love the Constitution — way more than all those commie liberals.  So everybody wins here, right?

That did not sit well with Texas Governor Greg Abbot who ordered today that the display be removed. It was.

Wait, what?

Abbott wrote a letter to explain the removal. In it, he calls our Bill of Rights display “tasteless,” a “spiteful message … intentionally designed to belittle and offend” and charges that it’s “far from promoting morals and the general welfare.” He even likened the Bill of Rights display to “a photograph of a crucifix immersed in a jar of urine.” All that vitriol, from looking at three founding fathers, the Statue of Liberty, and the Bill of Rights. One wonders how such disrespect for the Bill of Rights comports with Abbott’s oaths of office to uphold that sacred document.

I…huh?  This?

Ok…if you’re offended by some of our founders, the Statue of Liberty, and the Bill of Rights, maybe you’re in the wrong career path.

Andrew Seidel notes how Abbot jam packed even more irony into his order to take the display down:

In perhaps the greatest stroke of poetic justice I’ve ever seen, Abbott claims that our “exhibit promotes ignorance and falsehood” and cites 17 lines of a George Washington quote—a quote that is fraudulent.

Yes, you read that correctly. Abbott accused our exhibit of “promoting ignorance and falsehood” then quoted, at length, erroneous history to support his position. The quote comes from a fabricated prayer journal, misattributed to Washington.

The relevant portion of Abbott's letter.

Frank Grizzard, an editor of the George Washington Papers at the University of Virginia, wrote of the book from which Abbott pulled the quote:

“Tens of thousands of genuine Washington manuscripts have survived to the present, including many from the youthful Washington, and even a cursory comparison of the prayer book with a genuine Washington manuscript reveals that they are not the same handwriting.” Grizzard, The Ways of Providence: Religion & George Washington, page 51 (Mariner, 2005).

Gizzard’s book on the subject even provides examples of the fraudulent handwriting and Washington’s own—they look nothing alike. Id. at 53-55.

Not only are the prayers not in Washington’s handwriting, they were not composed by Washington himself as Abbott claims. To borrow from Gizzard, “Both claims are patently false.” Id. at 51. That prayer book had been “rejected by the Smithsonian Institute as having no value” and even at the time it first surfaced, “others continued to challenge its authenticity.” Id. at 52.

Other historians, such as John Fea, chair of the History Department at Messiah College and author of Was American Founded as a Christian Nation?: A Historical Introductionagree that this prayer book is not Washington’s:

“It is also far too pious for Washington. In fact, … George Washington only referenced Jesus Christ twice in all his extant writings and neither of them were in a prayer. This commissioner was not praying the words of George Washington.”

But that is the difference between historians and Abbott.

That Andrew Seidel is a sharp dude.

Anyway, the Freedom From Religion Foundation is going to sue the state of Texas.  They’re going to win, and they’re going to extract a hefty amount in legal fees from a governor who could not be more obviously breaking the law and who should absolutely know better.  And you know why?  Because of the document in this display:

And yet, somehow conservatives, who claim to support the party of financial accountability, will side with the law-breaker pissing away their tax dollars and brand the FFRF the bad guys.  It’s like Gov. Abbot is letting the taxpayers fund a campaign ad for him to the derpiest of Texas’ citizens.

You want to know the real problem?  It’s not lone ideologues like Greg Abbot.  It’s that there are a lot of people in the world so hung up on their political identity that they fail to detect the obvious when people like Gov. Abbot are fucking them.

"Don't You Lot tire of making this Same Accusation? Its just Dogma, something You deny ..."

Thoughts on the soup kitchen that ..."
"But did they Actually go help that Soup Kitchen."

Thoughts on the soup kitchen that ..."
"If The atheists wanted to Help for Show, then No it was not. If they ..."

Thoughts on the soup kitchen that ..."

Browse Our Archives