Stanley Hauerwas on Anglicanism

I’ve been reading Stanley Hauerwas, “Which Church? What Unity? Or, an Attempt to Say What I May Think about the Future of Christian Unity,” Pro Ecclesia 22.3 (2013): 263-80. In the article, Hauerwas basically explains why for a guy who harps on about the church a lot that he hasn’t spoken much about ecumenism. But along the way he says a few things about Anglicanism that stands out:

“I am an enthusiastic participant in church, but I have never been particularly concerned with denominational identity. At least I have seldom sought to participate in church life beyond the local parish. I am a Congregationalist with Catholic sensibilities. Which probably explains how I ended up in a Episcopal church” (266).

“Anglicanism is the name for the ongoing attempt to enact the interdependent character of churches in a manner that, in Kaye’s words, accomplishes ‘Catholicity without Leviathan’” (275). [NB from MB, I should add that in some cases Anglicanism can be like Protestantism without the Reformation or like Catholicity without Nicea].

“Anabaptists and Anglicans are seldom thought to share a common ecclesiology, but Kaye and Yoder have very similar understandings of the Catholic character of the church. I have often described my ecclesial identity to be that of a ‘high church Mennonite’ – to be sure, a descriptor originally designed to confuse my critics. But in light of the account of the catholic character of the church Yoder and Kaye provide, I hope my self-designation can be understood as a viable future for the church” (278-79)

Paula Fredriksen on Paul and Justification by Faith
Jesus Mythicists Get Sucker Punched
D.A. Carson on How Should We Understand the Gospel?
Paul Holloway Responds to Michael Bird about N.T. Wright and Sewanee University
  • x x

    Sounds to me like a complicated way to say very little.

  • MMJ

    What does this even try to say?
    I concur with anonymous ( x x) but would like to know if I am missing the point.


CLOSE | X

HIDE | X