Why Don’t We Have Both?

Out of the mouths of babes. And a little child shall lead them.

If the meme is unfamiliar to you, watch this commercial.

HT Catholic Memes on Facebook

Have a Snickers, Jesus
#YCAS2015 First Panel at the York Christian Apocrypha Symposium
Doctor Who in Christianity Today
#YCAS2015 Sixth Panel
  • http://againstjebelallawz.wordpress.com/ Enopoletus Harding

    ‘Cause they contradict each other; that’s why.

    • beau_quilter

      Shakespeare’s plays frequently contradict science as well, but I’ll gladly take them together.

      • http://againstjebelallawz.wordpress.com/ Enopoletus Harding

        Me too, but not as something inerrant.

        • beau_quilter

          James doesn’t subscribe to inerrancy; so, for him there’s room for both.

          Hamster, of course, is another story.

  • guest

    I’m fine with having both the Bible and science as long as people understand that the Bible is a collection of myths, legends, poetry and proverbs and science is a method for finding out the truth about the world, and if the Bible contradicts the evidence gathered by scientists, it’s the Bible that’s wrong.

    People taking Genesis literally is stupid. (They’re a great band but their lyrics aren’t factually based).

    • saladgyrl

      Actually, archeology and contemporary historical accounts back up many things in the Bible…