How I can be a Philosopher and a Christian at the same time

There is a big difference between “Christendom” (an institution) and “Christianity” (a way of life)–it is a difference that persons of Christian faith should always keep in mind.

3624789-Soren-Kierkegaard-Quote-In-the-Christianity-of-Christendom-the 2

I’ve spent my entire professional career as a philosophy professor teaching in Catholic institutions of higher education. Since I’ve always been straightforward with those interviewing me, my colleagues, and my students that I am not Catholic, I’ve never been accused of being a “Catholic philosopher” (although many of my colleagues wear that description as a badge of honor). I used to struggle, however, with whether I am a “Christian philosopher.” Somewhere along the line in my early years of being a professor I became defensive when talking with others about this. I regularly would say that “I’m not a Christian philosopher. I’m a philosopher who happens to be a Christian,” as if I freely chose to become a philosopher but was saddled with being a Christian in the same way I was saddled with curly hair, blue eyes, and bad teeth.

More than twenty-five years ago, Jeanne and I went to visit Forrest and Nancy, a couple who had been very important in my life before Jeanne and I met. In the seven or eight years since I had last seen this couple, a number of big things had happened in my life, including a divorce, a bitter custody battle, a remarriage, and completing my PhD in philosophy. In the middle of one conversation, Nancy asked me a question that has stayed with me ever since: “How can you be a Christian and a philosopher?” The question was sincere, without a hint of challenge or judgment. She simply wanted to know. Nancy admittedly knew little about philosophy, but she’d at least heard that philosophy is the art of questioning, of asking better and better questions about the biggest possible issues.

The problem, as she saw it, was that for a Christian, most if not all of these questions are already answered. Why, if as a Christian I know all of the answers to these questions, would I spend my professional life continuing to ask them and inspiring others to do the same? Why not just introduce everyone to the truth? Nancy’s question returned me to my youth, to bumper stickers on cars in the church parking lot that read “God said it, I believe it, That settles it,” to sensing from those around me that I thought too much, that I asked too many questions, that I was too smart for my own good and too big for my britches. What I needed to do was simply believe and shut up. It would make my life, and that of those around me, a lot easier.

As I have processed Nancy’s question over time, I’ve came to realize that the joy and fulfillment I find in life of the mind, of academia, and of open-ended questioning is partially, at least a teeny bit, the working out of a rebellious “up yours” to everyone who sought to fit me for their straitjacket. Philosophy on the one hand, as a life-defining activity, is who I am, and I even get paid for doing it. Being a Christian, on the other hand, is something I was born into. It was part of the atmosphere I breathed from birth. My family and community were Christian, the first words I learned were Christian, the first songs I sang were Christian. One doesn’t just walk away from that or shed it as a snake sheds its skin. I’ve never really believed someone who smugly with an air of superiority says something like “I was raised in (fill in the blank religion), but now I know better and I’m an atheist.” If you were really raised in a religious tradition that seeped into your bones and psyche before you even became fully conscious and self-aware, then that influence does not end by flipping an intellectual switch. So I’m a philosopher who happens to be a Christian.

Along the way, a philosopher friend reminded me of a distinction that Kierkegaard makes between “Christendom” and “Christianity.” Christendom, on the one hand, is an institution, a top-down hierarchy, the various rules, prescribed actions, and rituals that human beings have constructed to limit and control human behavior and various dangerous elements of Christ’s message. This is what Simone Weil called “the Great Beast,” the powerful collective which attempts to control human freedom and choice in the name of God. For better or for worse, I was born into one specific, very powerful version of Christendom. Christianity for Kierkegaard, on the other hand, is a radical, individual commitment to following Christ at all costs, a commitment to the law of freedom and love so challenging and frightening that it shows Christendom to be a timid and safe mockery of faith.

When it’s put that way, I realize that I can be a Christian philosopher—the two could very well go perfectly hand in hand. Working this possibility out in real time has been the focus of this blog for the past five years, as well as the central theme of (shameless plug) my recently published book (check out the “Publications” tab at the top of the page!). A few weeks ago, a person in media and promotions at my college taped a 10-15 minute interview with me about the book; she sent me the edited and distilled two-minute version last week. During the interview she asked me the million dollar question: “How can you be a philosopher and a Christian?” Here’s what I said in response:

Intellect challenges faith with questions, with doubt, while faith provides a framework within which you can be free and fearless to ask those questions. Faith provides a certain amount of security that lets you be fearless, because you know that the answers are there, even if you might never fully know what they are.

I don’t actually remember saying that, but I like it! It is the brief version of where I am after a number of years of consciously grappling with how to get my intellect and my faith to talk to and cohabit with each other fruitfully. It is possible to be a philosopher and a Christian after all.

"Virgin birth is certainly a debatable point; it's enough of a question mark that I ..."

Why I Am Not an Atheist
"Yes, history seems to show that whether its religion or ideology. I just finished a ..."

Pragmatic Christianity: Why Doctrine Often Does ..."
"But how Jesus' "love your enemies" gets twisted into "God wills it" referring to slaughtering ..."

Pragmatic Christianity: Why Doctrine Often Does ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • https://seekeroftruthweb.wordpress.com/ (((Kevin)))

    This makes me think of something Irshad Manji, a reformist Muslim, said. She contends that it is dogma, not faith, that fears questions.

    • Vance Morgan

      Anne Lamott says that the opposite of faith is not doubt. The opposite of faith is certainty.

      • https://weseeinamirrordarkly.com Kirk Leavens

        Pete Enns, “The Sin of Certainty” as well.

  • https://weseeinamirrordarkly.com Kirk Leavens

    I agree with the spirit of your thoughts here. I am uneasy with the dichotomy drawn between “Christianity” and “Christendom.” Is the world becoming postchristian or postchristendom? For most, Christianity is a religion, and therefore equates with Christendom and is inseparable from it. I prefer “Christ follower” or ‘Jesus follower’ as he told us to follow him, not to become “Christians.” When one refers to oneself as “Christian” in America, the immediate assumption is, we are saying we are evangelical, which may not be the case at all. Walls immediately go up and communication is stymied. On the other hand, saying one is a follower of Jesus, besides being more accurate, creates a situation where the other person is more likely to want an explanation.

    • Vance Morgan

      I don’t disagree with what you are saying, but am hesitant to scrap the word “Christianity” just because people have come to conflate it with an institution. Jesus was not seeking to establish a religion–he was seeking to show us a way of life. You know all this, obviously–this is why I call my blog (and my new book) “Freelance Christianity”–to perhaps provide the idea that there are many ways to follow Jesus that do not easily conform to our religious frameworks.

  • See Noevo

    As I recall, in the Catholic Church, those studying for the
    priesthood must complete certain philosophy requirements before ever getting
    into the theology curriculum. The CC believes you can’t do theology properly
    without philosophy.