A number of my posts to date have been an attempt to put a pin in the party balloon of techno-Utopianism, which might lead some readers to think I’m some kind of Luddite squatting in a corner making the sign of the cross to ward off iPhones and refusing to get my children proper medical care because antibiotics are Satan’s gumdrops or something.
Nothing could be further from the truth. I love technology, which might explain why I’ve made a career of covering it. Heck, the majority of my work focuses on the most trivial and useless application of technology of all: video and computer games. When my son had a twinge in his side, we had him to the hospital in a trice, and the next day he was operated on for acute appendicitis in a procedure which left three tiny cuts rather than splitting him open like a freshly-caught cod.
So: technology, yay!
However, I retain a healthy skepticism about it. I don’t think it’s the panacea for all of mankind’s problems, even while it can do a great job at helping minimize suffering. My point is this: while pain and disease are bad (and I know this from close, personal experience) they can also be redemptive (something else I know from close, personal experience). I’ve seen horrible, pointless, premature deaths and miserable suffering. If I could have done something to prevent them, I would have. I have also seen those very horrors, however, transformed into moments of grace. We should do what we can to address physical suffering, but we needn’t always fear that suffering.
I’m absolutely delighted by modern medical techniques that can treat diseases, replace failing organs, and provide sophisticated prosthetics for people who’ve lost limbs. It’s when we move beyond the mere healing of the body and start attempting to redefine what it means to be human, or unleashing new technology with amazing destructive potential, that we need to start exercising extreme caution.
So we can print out replacement bones on a 3D printer. That’s great!
However, we may well soon be able to print out active viruses on a 3D printer. That’s bad!
You can’t look at something like CyberKnife and come away unimpressed at modern medicine’s capacity for good. CyberKnife is a brand of stereotactic radiosurgery, which uses intense, focused radiation to shrink cancerous masses with minimal damage to surrounding tissue. It looks like something designed by Aperture Labs:
I’m in the middle of shuttling my extremely active, oddly-otherwise-healthy 89-year-old father back and forth to appointments so CyberKnife can shrink the malignant mass in his lung. His age precluded surgery, chemo, or traditional radiation, but this wonderful machine offers some hope.
Beyond its pinpoint accuracy, which allows it to “paint” the targeted mass with radiation, CyberKnife is different because it uses “image guidance software to track and continually adjust treatment for any patient or tumor movement.” This means that patients don’t have to be bolted into a frame or kept perfectly still or in awkward positions. Unlike some other stereotactic radiosurgery systems, CyberKnife can treat more than just brain tumors: it can reach “the prostate, lung, brain, spine, liver, pancreas, and kidney. ”
Also: CyberKnife is a way cool name. Sounds like an accessory I would have attached to my Maskatron action figure.
Five or six short treatments with minimal side effects may just buy my father some extra time to be with his family, work at the soup kitchen, usher at Mass (he says he has to help the “old people” to their seats), and generally live a bit. That’s a good thing, because who wouldn’t want to spend a couple more years with this guy?