“Self-compassion is an extension of Jesus’ compassion…”
In my life and work, one of the most helpful pieces of Brene Brown’s work is the way she distinguished guilt and shame.
Guilt says: I’ve done a bad thing. It is behavior focused. It is positively correlated with healthy change. Self is not threatened so it does not need to be defensive.
Shame says: I am bad. It is personhood focused. It is positively correlated with self-destructive behavior. Self is threatened so often goes into defensive survival mode.
Guilt works to preserve and maintain connection.
Shame works to disconnect us from self, God, and others.
And disconnection is a big deal because most of us fear isolation more than mortality.
When we mess up, we face a choice about how we will respond.
Many of us have been taught that the way of transformation and reformation is to take our sin seriously by beating up on ourselves with appropriate self-contempt and shame. We’ve been told that we “should” feel disconnected; and that anything less than that denies the holiness of God.
However, when we look at how Jesus related to women in the midst of sin, we see a very different pattern. Jesus encouraged guilt and discouraged shame. He worked to help them face their behavior and at the same time maintain personhood and connection.
Take for example his conversation with the woman at the well. Even in the context of a cultural divide that affirmed distance, Jesus sought to connect with this woman by initiating conversation. He drew her in as he spoke about offering her what she sought: water. But, he did not stop there. He brought to light the “shame-full” secret that was hiding beneath the surface of her life, preventing deeper connection with him.
“Go call your husband.”
When she responded with a half-truth ”I have no husband,” he persisted in revealing the facts she most feared: “”You are right when you say you have no husband. The fact is, you have had five husbands, and the man you now have is not your husband. What you have just said is quite true.”
He spoke of her behavior and maintained connection all the while, even affirmed her for telling the truth without mentioning that it was only half the story! He invited her to life-transforming guilt while protecting her from destructive, soul deadening, disconnecting shame. Transformation happened when he elevated her person by speaking the truth that he was both the Messiah and the one who was seeking connection with her: “I who speak to you am he.” Self-contempt and self-criticism had no place in the story. His compassion for her invited her to be compassionate toward herself.
When we refuse self-compassion and choose self-contempt, we become dangerous to ourselves. And in that context of self-criticism, we tend toward denial and defensiveness about our own behavior for the sake of survival. We seek to disconnect from the truth about our own lives and so from others and from God. When we give into our tendency toward self-contempt, we re-inforce the idea that our personhood is bad and we embolden disconnecting shame… all of which make us less likely to change our behavior.
Jesus’ compassion provided the safe relational space in which these women could openly face their errant behavior as the doorway toward making new choices. They did not need denial or defensiveness. Self-compassion is an extension of Jesus’ compassion, offering within ourselves that same safety so critical to facing the reality of our sinful, foolish behavior. It allows us to meet our guilt while maintaining the transforming power of connection with ourselves, God, and others.
Quite simply and perhaps counter-intuitively, self-compassion is the doorway to transformation.
How do you see guilt? How do you see shame? How do you see Jesus’ compassion being connected to self-compassion?