Crucifiable cruciformity

Everyone today wants to talk about the cruciformity of Christian politics. Much to the good there.

But, despite narrative theology and NT Wright and everything, there’s an odd abstraction of the cross from the rest of the gospel narrative. Cruciform politics is often translated as a politics of sympathy and co-suffering. It sometimes merges into a kind of politics of toleration.

It’s essential to include Wright’s question of crucifiability in any political theology that pretends to take its cues from the cross. Jesus didn’t begin on the cross; He didn’t just happen to be crucified. He was crucified because He aggressively attacked the abuses and oppression of Jewish leaders, because He ignored Jewish scruples about table fellowship and Sabbath; because He said “Woe” a lot.

A cruciform politics might culminate in passive suffering. But before the passive suffering comes very active confrontation.

"I return to my earlier question, which you refused to answer. How do you define ..."

Here Comes the Judge
"The acknowledgement of the true God as the basis for law is fundamental to a ..."

Here Comes the Judge
"You're confusing the basis for law with religious sectarianism & institutional Christianity. The acknowledgement of ..."

Here Comes the Judge
"Rosenstock-Huessy believes that God has a unique relationship to time that no human being has, ..."

God, Time, Eternity

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!