More on Mark’s Missing Ending

In a recent discussion of the ending of Mark’s Gospel on X-Talk, it was suggested that having Jesus himself appear to the women, after his appearance has been promised through angels, is redundant, and I agree. But this is precisely what Matthew does to Mark’s narrative, i.e. create a story with precisely this redundancy, and this itself needs to be explained. It perhaps suggests that Matthew knew a story significantly different from Mark’s, and this was the best he could do to weave the details of the two together.

Mark’s story, on the other hand, does not merely promise that Jesus will be seen. It tells of women who are to deliver a message about Jesus being seen in the future, but they do not deliver it. The narrative of Mark, as it now stands, leaves the reader wondering whether the disciples ever saw Jesus in spite of their not getting the message.

It is for this reason that I think the stories in the Gospel of Peter and in John 21 preserve echoes of the original ending of Mark. Not having received the message (and perhaps having already left town anyway), the Galilean disciples return to their previous lives as fishermen etc., and it is in that context that Jesus nonetheless graciously meets them and encounters them.
""The miraculous Jesus obviously didn't exist" is at best an incredibly strange way of saying ..."

Earl Doherty as Christian Reformer
"None of this contention is especially interesting to me.Since I don't believe in the supernatural, ..."

Earl Doherty as Christian Reformer
"You're right, of course. There's nothing in Paul that points to the distinction Carrier is ..."

Earl Doherty as Christian Reformer
"Right I found my copy, I was mixing up two mythicist theories. But Carrier's account ..."

Earl Doherty as Christian Reformer

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment