Has Creationism’s Appendicitis Been Cured?

An interesting piece of science news in recent days was the proposal of a plausible function for the appendix. Clearly this clinches the argument about its design by a supernatural being. Just consider all these characteristics of the appendix:

  • It apparently reboots the good bacteria in the gut if they are wiped out by another disease.
  • It keeps the human population from growing too large by eliminating members of the herd now and again.
  • It provides ongoing gainful employment for doctors who are regularly paid to remove them.
  • What could be stronger proof of its design than the fact that it has a purpose, yet you can remove it with minimal ill effects.

What does this prove? That it is possible to “see” design in whatever one beholds. I am not against that per se, but I do find problematic the attempt to argue that this somehow implies science’s inability to come up with a natural explanation, or that the argument leads naturally (if you’ll excuse the pun) to a supramaterial creator.

If Intelligent Design is really open to aliens and time travellers being the designers, how does that match up with their express goal of combatting materialism?

At any rate, I was not surprised that the proponents of Intelligent Design were quick to mention this. What is interesting is the acknowledgement implicit in the recent post on the subject on the Uncommon Descent blog that this fits well with evolution through natural selection: its continued presence suggests that, if it does not have an essential function at present, it had one in the very recent past.

Detecting design isn’t that hard – in fact, it is too easy. There doesn’t seem to be any evidence that is strictly speaking considered incompatible with intelligent design by its proponents.

Sometime soon I hope to explore a related question head-on. In what sense, if any, is appeal to God an explanation?

""For example, N.T. Wright, who is considered a leading authority on Paul, writes books defending ..."

Gaps in Jesus’ Fossil Record?
"Well if you don't mind I could use some help with someone else; https://disqus.com/by/shepv...Namely his ..."

Star Trek Discovery: Choose Your Pain
"Since I specified that with which I disagreed, there is no need for your feigned ..."

Gaps in Jesus’ Fossil Record?
"An important canonical issue: is the 70s cartoon series part of the canon?"

Friday Recap #AARSBL17 – AAR Trek ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • http://www.blogger.com/profile/08144417439505262113 Elliot

    Your last sentence reminded me of this quote:”[They say] ‘We do not know how this is, but we know that God can do it.’ You poor fools! God can make a cow out of a tree, but has He ever done so? Therefore show some reason why a thing is so, or cease to hold that it is so.”William of Conches (c.1090-c.1154)

  • http://www.blogger.com/profile/02561146722461747647 James F. McGrath

    It is a great quote (I wish I could find the time to read William of Conches). I particularly like it because it illustrates that critical thinking and reason are not new inventions. :)