Quote of the Day (Daniel Radosh)

If science is the search for answers, creationism is the elimination of questions (Daniel Radosh, Rapture Ready! (New York: Scribner, 2008) p.286).
"You still seem not to understand. Zechariah is about a historical high priest named Joshua ..."

Richard Carrier as False Prophet
"Hi Vinny, would you agree that as Mark, Matthew and Josephus are not attempting to ..."

Earl Doherty as Christian Reformer
"No, I read Zechariah 8 at Wiki – it’s pretty easy to understand and yes ..."

Richard Carrier as False Prophet
"Are you ready to admit that the answer to the question you posed in your ..."

Earl Doherty as Christian Reformer

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • http://www.blogger.com/profile/13661140168255152202 Jonathan

    I simply don’t get why the issue seems to be creation v. evolution. Why aren’t there any camps in the middle of these views, let alone more that simply support both. If science is the search for answers than why would a true scientist criticize or rebuke another who is seeking a different path to answer of the same question? I’m often just baffled at the shouting match from both sides and why it is such a heavy debate.

  • http://www.blogger.com/profile/02561146722461747647 James F. McGrath

    Jonathan, there are indeed many camps in the middle. One of the biggest disservices done to public understanding of the interface of science and religion is the impression given by atheist scientists who understand their atheism to be a result of their scientific inquiry on the one hand, and religionists with a similar either/or approach in the young earth creationist and intelligent design camps. There is a lot of middle ground, and most of my entries about science and religion on this blog seek to explore it! :)