Scholarly Publishing

Since I know lots of academics in different fields read this blog, I thought I’d ask a question of particular interest to us. How do (or would) you list publications on your blog that are aimed at a general readership but are not for that reason lacking in academic value or scholarly content?

Many of us write such books and articles at one point or another. It is rather straightforward to distinguish between peer-reviewed journal articles and other articles, be they in magazines or newspapers. But in the case of book it seems that there are university presses, and trade or popular presses, but in between there are also other publishers that publish books that are genuinely scholarly as well as ones that are less so.

Do you list books in the latter category, ones that are scholarly but aimed at a wider readership, in a separate place on your CV, or do you simply lump your books together, knowing that those interested merely in finding out what you’ve written won’t care, while those who are interested in evaluating your scholarship will know the difference anyway?

Does anyone have any additional information to share on whether, and to what extent, manuscripts submitted even to trade presses, if they are works of non fiction by academics, get submitted to some sort of peer review? Or is there only editorial review in such cases?

On a final note, clearly what counts as publishing in terms of one’s academic career are peer reviewed publications, and that should remain the case. Yet decisions about publication in traditional print format often involves not just peer review, but editors who must take factors like marketability and sales into consideration, and in the case of journal articles, the limited number of articles that can fit in a given issue. It will be interesting to see whether academic publishing moves more in the direction of print-on-demand (with or without a subsidy or fee) for books, and open access web-based venues for articles. The technology is there, and lots of people who need to “publish or perish” might feel more at ease knowing that their work on some obscure but important topic can be published in a peer reviewed venue based only on its academic value, and not on whether any other person then alive actually would want to pay to read it.
"More on this project and the St. Catherine's Monastery Library from 2012 Library of Congress ..."

Spectral Imaging of Palimpsests at #AARSBL17
"If you say that what you think we have read is not the original, you ..."

The “Original Aramaic Lord’s Prayer” is ..."
"Unlike Crossan and Funk, I don't think passages such as those in Luke that can ..."

Gaps in Jesus’ Fossil Record?
"Since you think that everything important to conservatives is excluded and I think that little ..."

Gaps in Jesus’ Fossil Record?

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • Drew Tatusko

    On the second question I think that open source publishing is a great leap forward for academic knowledge production. There is a lot of really good research that is done that just does not make the market cut for a given issue or volume and that is often a shame. Many faculty, like Doug Kellner at UCLA, have just posted their unpublished manuscripts online that they decided not to submit for any given number of reason, or that did not fit the traditional mould of a print publication.I would hope that these works can be indexed and included somehow in libraries in order for students and the academic community to access them more easily and freely.I once had a publication turned down on first draft because it did not refer to the reviewers texts. My second revision was accepted and I included his references, but only to argue against them anyway. that kind of stuff happens and I fear too frequently.

  • BSM

    On trade publications…They all go through some sort of editorial review. Sometimes you’ll get a panel of experts who look at an article but it’s still closer to editorial review. The Harvard Business Review is a good example here. It’s a publication that’s very close to being a low end scholarly work. Yet it’s usually counted as a trade publication because business professionals read it. (although most business professors read it too)I’m not quite clear if you are asking about how to list your blog on your CV or not?However, if you are asking take a look at Michael Stephen’s blog and cv: to his CV at his profile)Incidentally I co-presented with him once. He’s famous in library land but I doubt he even remembers me!:-/