Review Revisited: James Herrick’s Scientific Mythologies

A long time ago, in a parallel blogoverse, I reviewed James Herrick’s book Scientific Mythologies.

Almost 2 1/2 years later, D. G. D. Davidson has posted a review on his blog, in which he disagrees with me about the extent of the book’s awfulness.

In between the two, Gabriel McKee also reviewed the book.

Since it has been so long since I read the book and wrote the review, I will not try to defend the details of my analysis. And however much Davidson may disagree with me, he too finds the book disappointing in certain respects. Have other readers of this blog read the book more recently than I have? What did you make of it? Whose review most closely reflects your own impressions, if any of them?

"You only got around to trying to turn the main question into the last points ..."

Cherry-Picking from the Bible: Lessons Learned ..."
"Yes, the Gospel of John is the one place where Jesus said it explicitly - ..."

Gaps in Jesus’ Fossil Record?
"I too wonder about mythicist behavior on my blog. If it were me trying to ..."

Gaps in Jesus’ Fossil Record?
"I'm clearly loving "Discovery". They are doing a great job of doing what "Star Trek" ..."

Star Trek Discovery: Choose Your Pain

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • http://deusexmagicalgirl.com/ D. G. D. Davidson

    Thanks for the link, and thanks, too, for pointing me to McKee’s review. I had missed that one.

  • http://www.patheos.com/blogs/religionprof/ James F. McGrath

    Thanks for taking the time to mention and interact with my review!