Teach the Other Controversy

This is not poking fun at beliefs about creation – we all get to a point where we either posit something that simply is, or say something not all that different from “It’s turtles all the way down.” But those who advocate “teaching the controversy” or “teaching both sides” rarely actually want that to happen. How many people who say that kids should hear “both sides” when it comes to mainstream science (in which, in fact, however many sides there may be, young-earth creationism and other similar deceptions are not among them) would in fact stand up for equal time for a competing creation narrative, or for atheist views being shared alongside Christian ones in some context or other?

The problem with “teach the controversy” is that it is only introduced where there isn’t genuine controversy, by people who don’t actually want views opposing their own to be given “equal time.”

"My comment was not directed at anything that either McGrath or Ehrman have said, so ..."

Gaps in Jesus’ Fossil Record?
"Well, there are a number of ways to explain that. First, the original Trek was ..."

Star Trek: Discovery – Into the ..."
"When interpreting Star Trek we have to start with the presupposition that Star Trek is ..."

Star Trek: Discovery – Into the ..."
"I'm trying to think of an example of "fake news" in biblical studies: Maybe when ..."

On My Way to Boston for ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • John Weightman

    Well expressed, James and thank you. And btw, good to link up.

  • http://twitter.com/jonhendry Jonathan W. Hendry


  • Barghest

    There’s actually a whole array of t-shirts with topics like that: https://controversy.wearscience.com/design/turtle/