Quote of the Day (Chris Heard)

This is…a plea that we follow Augustine and divest ourselves of the notion that interpreting a text literally means taking it as an historically accurate account of things that happened in time and space. If the text isn’t an historical narrative, then treating it as an historical narrative is not properly a literal interpretation.

— Chris Heard, “Interpreting Genesis 1 ‘literally'” on the blog Higgaion

 

"But Paul did think Satan existed, and so Paul could have thought Satan was influencing ..."

James, Brother of Jesus, Bother of ..."
"I don’t believe Paul as a Jew or Christian, thought Pagan Gods really existed. Although, ..."

James, Brother of Jesus, Bother of ..."
"I wonder if Paul thought the Romans were unwittingly influenced by gods and so crucified ..."

James, Brother of Jesus, Bother of ..."
"Not satanic mind control."

James, Brother of Jesus, Bother of ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • Let us also divest ourselves of the notion that just because the Scriptures do not lend themselves to ready reconciliation with our evolving views of science that they are for this reason any less the word of God.