Jeffrey Gibson on the Disciples’ Prayer

I had the privilege of taking a look recently at a draft of a book Jeffrey Gibson has been working on, about the Lord’s Prayer, or as he prefers it be called, the Disciples’ Prayer. He has a very interesting take on it, suggesting that a key background to the prayer is to be found in the Biblical theme of the rebellious wilderness generation. He treats all of the elements as not mere petitions for something to be done by God, but that something happen through the one praying. And he makes the case that, as with other prayers Jesus gives his disciples, it is a prayer for protection against apostasy.

He has asked me what I think, and I think he makes a cogent argument. I still want to ponder some of the scholarly aspects of his case. But perhaps an equally significant test of his interpretation of the prayer is to pray the Disciples’ Prayer with the meaning he suggests that its elements had, in its earliest form. And so I’ve paraphrased it here, to try to get at the gist of how Jeffrey understands it. What follows is entirely my own wording, inspired by Jeffrey’s book – he should not be blamed for the details, although he should be given credit for the concepts where they are compelling.

Feel free to try it out too, if you are someone who prays, and then leave your comments here. Presumably if you find it meaningful, you will want to buy his book!

The Disciples’ Prayer


May we not behave in a way that dishonors your name,

But live under your dominion,

Having and being grateful for each day’s provisions

unlike our ancestors who grumbled in the wilderness.

May we not test you as they did.


"That’s a funny alternative to the Satan Claus myth I’ve heard about. Are there people ..."

Atheist Reindeer Conspiracy
"Well even before the movie's release its director was telling fans that Luke was the ..."

Looking Forward to The Last Jedi
"Gee, Vinnie, the way you put it sounds as though historicists are getting all consternated ..."

Earl Doherty as Christian Reformer
"I find that debating with mythicists can be very tiring. They consistently fail to provide ..."

Richard Carrier as False Prophet

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • Jeffrey Gibson

    James, thanks for this! I am especially impressed that a student of Jimmy Dunn, who argues for a position on the aim of the LP/DP that I argue against (the eschatalogical interpretation), finds what I have to say at least a little persuasive.

    I will be happy to send a PDF of the current draft to anyone who wishes to see it — under the condition that they will send me feedback on what I say there. Contact me at