Revisiting the Mandaeans and the New Testament

My article “Revisiting the Mandaeans and the New Testament” has appeared today in The Bible and Interpretation.

"Jesus is not just a 'prophet'. As for 'We also see the impotence of Jesus' ..."

Not Loving the Bible
"I don't bother with Facebook anymore. I really couldn't care less that someone just finished ..."

Blogs as Havens for those Fleeing ..."
"I think Freud would say it's ridiculous that adults, who have long abandoned lies/fairy tales ..."

Not Loving the Bible
"Mark is invoking an understood "Prophet archetype" that says Prophets are without honor in their ..."

Not Loving the Bible

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • Hello James.

    Could it be safely said the Mandaeans are a Jewish Gnotic sect rejecting the claims of Christianity?

    Greetings.

    Lothars Sohn – Lothar’s son

    http://lotharlorraine.wordpress.com

    • I am pretty happy with that way of putting things. But it needs to be added that, while the origins of Mandaeism are in Judaism, as a Gnostic group they reject Judaism and the Jewish Creator God quite emphatically.

      • Kman

        There is absolutely no evidence which can proof that
        Mandaeans are a sect of Judaism. If anything scholarship had proven that
        Mandaeans are separate from Jews & Christians. Scholarship has also examined
        how much of an influence Mandaean religion has had on Christianity. For example Gospel of Thomas which later was
        rejected by Catholics, is almost word for word from Mandaean writings. Another example
        is Manichaeism. As well Manichaeism wirings at times were also word for word
        translations of Mandaean manuscripts. There are many other reasons which shows
        that Mandaeans are totally opposite to Judaism which I happily discuss with you
        if interested.

        • I think you are misunderstanding what is being said. It is possible to say both that Judaism and Christianity are separate religions, and that the latter began as a movement within the former. I address some of the evidence in this article which appeared in ARAM Periodical: http://digitalcommons.butler.edu/facsch_papers/193/

          The Gospel of Thomas does not contain anything that is explicitly or distinctively Mandaean, and the fact that it has a positive view of Jesus seems like decisive evidence that it has no connection with Mandaeism.