Why Don’t We Have Both?

Out of the mouths of babes. And a little child shall lead them.

If the meme is unfamiliar to you, watch this commercial.

HT Catholic Memes on Facebook

" Even apart from the possibility that Christians might object to the nationalistic ethos that so ..."

Review of Just Immigration
"As I said, we interpret it differently. I interpret it as a prayer. You interpret ..."

New Age Translation of the Lord’s ..."
"So, your advice is for people not to talk to you anymore.Gotcha."

Mistaking Fear for Faith
"I keep my reply brief. It's best to not feed the trolls."

Mistaking Fear for Faith

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • http://againstjebelallawz.wordpress.com/ Enopoletus Harding

    ‘Cause they contradict each other; that’s why.

    • http://timebottle.weebly.com/ Beau Quilter

      Shakespeare’s plays frequently contradict science as well, but I’ll gladly take them together.

      • http://againstjebelallawz.wordpress.com/ Enopoletus Harding

        Me too, but not as something inerrant.

        • http://timebottle.weebly.com/ Beau Quilter

          James doesn’t subscribe to inerrancy; so, for him there’s room for both.

          Hamster, of course, is another story.

  • guest

    I’m fine with having both the Bible and science as long as people understand that the Bible is a collection of myths, legends, poetry and proverbs and science is a method for finding out the truth about the world, and if the Bible contradicts the evidence gathered by scientists, it’s the Bible that’s wrong.

    People taking Genesis literally is stupid. (They’re a great band but their lyrics aren’t factually based).

    • $26634104

      Actually, archeology and contemporary historical accounts back up many things in the Bible…