I wonder if the reconciliation paradigm for race relations in the United States is a faulty approach and plays into many of the white racist biases of our culture. Because the experience of various races in the United States is incommensurable, a paradigm based on parallelism of experience simply perpetuates the power dynamics intrinsic to racism as embodied in contemporary North American culture.
A couple of recent books have especially convinced me of this. The first was James Cone’s The Cross and the Lynching Tree, which illustrates that even white liberal Protestants of the 20th century failed to connect the horrendous lynchings in the south to the crucifixion of Jesus, even while they attempted to address racism theologically.
A second book, Dear White Christians (Prophetic Christianity) makes the most compelling argument I have ever read for reparations as the essential paradigm for race relations, over against reconciliation. It is really a must read.
Of course, the recent movie Selma is also convicting, because it illustrates the degree to which the Civil Rights movements was a Black Church movement, and how infrequently the white church participated in the movement.
Some recent excellent essays on Selma include:What went wrong with the Oscar hopes for ‘Selma’?
Then there is perhaps the most important book ever written in English on race and theology, J. Kameron Carter’s Race: A Theological Account
He and some colleagues have written an essential post that is worth the time on King’s faith as driving his activism.