Today’s Aquinas: With God, Knowing is Doing

Today’s Aquinas: With God, Knowing is Doing April 13, 2015

ThomasAquinas We’re blogging through St. Thomas Aquinas’ Compendium Theologiae, sometimes called his Shorter Summa. Find the previous posts here.

If you’ve been paying attention then Thomas’ next move should be unsurprising.  First, Thomas showed that God is simply One.  Then he showed that God has intellect; and that His intellect is the same as Himself: we approach some small understanding of God by considering His intellect as a distinct thing, but God is without part: He is all One.  Lastly, Thomas has shown as that God has volition, or will…and so now it’s time to show that God’s will is part and parcel of God simply speaking, and in particular that God’s will is identical to His intellect:

Evidently God’s will cannot be anything other than His intellect. For, since a good that is apprehended by the intellect is the object of the will, it moves the will and is the will’s act and perfection. In God, however, there is no distinction between mover and moved, act and potency, perfection and perfectible, as is clear from the truths we have already gained. Also, the divine intellect and the divine essence are identical. Therefore the will of God is not distinct from the divine intellect and God’s essence.

A human being sees, then understands the situation, then wills a response; these are in succession.  In God there is no succession; these are all one single action.  To understand, to will, and to do as God does is simply to be God.  God is, knows, and does all at once.

Another consideration: among the various perfections of things, the chief are intellect and will. A sign of this is that they are found in the nobler beings. But the perfections of all things are one in God, and this is His essence, as we showed above. In God, therefore, intellect and will are identical with His essence.

Thomas has shown that the good things in the creatures around us are found in perfect form in God; and all of these perfections are one in God.  Intellect and will are perfections of the higher creatures (human beings and angels), and so must exist pre-eminently and perfectly in the simplicity of God.

photo credit: Public Domain; source Wikimedia Commons

"You should update your bookshelf page accordingly."

In which the Blogger is Very ..."
"You need to change the "KS" photo. It's of KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI. It is not ..."

Meme Watch: Economic Bullsh*t
"This has been on my wish list for a while. Sounds like I need to ..."

The Apostasy That Wasn’t
"Is not the “splendor of heaven” the presence of God in all His glory, of ..."

Splendor Fatigue

Browse Our Archives

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • Sophia Sadek

    Mention of “nobler beings” brings to mind the subjective definition of noble. The Olympic games retain the association of gold, silver, and bronze with levels of nobility. How we define the gold standard says much about what we consider to be noble. The same can also be said of silver and bronze.

    • Will Duquette

      By “nobler beings”, Thomas would have meant beings that exhibit more of the perfections of God than others. Plants are nobler than stones in this sense, and animals nobler than plants. It was an objective ranking, not a subjective one. He would not be able to say which of two beings was “nobler” in all cases (it’s no doubt a partial ordering), but animals really are qualitatively different than stones.

      • Sophia Sadek

        This is definitely a subjective definition because it is based on Aquinas’ conception of the material Creator. In chemistry, the noble elements are considered noble based on the fact that they do not react with other elements. They are inert and unchanging. This is considered more “noble” than the old definition of gold as the noblest substance.

        If the divine is perceived as unchanging, stones would qualify as more noble than plants because they change more slowly. Plants would be qualified as more noble than animals because they remain fixed and unmoving. Other animals would be qualified as more noble than human animals because they show more consistency from one individual to the other.