This seems relevant in view of my post, earlier today, regarding the LDS Church endorsement of anti-discrimination laws in Utah:
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/01/28/gun-range-ban-on-muslims-draws-fire/
My personal position would be that, although I doubt that this gun range owner’s position will survive legal challenge, I think she ought to have the right to refuse service to anybody, for any reason.
As I’ve said, I trend strongly libertarian.
However . . . I also think that her stance is wrong, hurtful, divisive, unwise, unattractive, and probably bigoted. And, if I were in the area and were considering which gun range to patronize, I would most definitely boycott hers. I would rather give up firing ranges altogether than patronize one with such a policy.
What do you think?
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In