“Why the Oxford English Dictionary (and Not Webster’s 1828)”

In this week’s article from Interpreter: A Journal of Mormon Scripture, Stanford Carmack continues the remarkable work that he and Royal Skousen have been doing on the language of the Book of Mormon:

http://www.mormoninterpreter.com/why-the-oxford-english-dictionary-and-not-websters-1828/h

Properly understood — and, thus far, the mockers haven’t even tried to properly understand or engage it — their work constitutes a stunning and quite unanticipated challenge to those who would dismiss the Book of Mormon as a shallow nineteenth-century fraud.

Posted from Victor, New York