“The Goose and the Gander”: An Observer’s Note on the Jenkins/Hamblin Exchange

In their online conversation about Book of Mormon historicity, Professor Phillip Jenkins has repeatedly demanded “evidence” from Professor William Hamblin, while Professor Hamblin has sought to first establish some methodological parameters for evaluating such evidence and what it means — plainly because he regards Professor Jenkins’s position as profoundly flawed, methodologically speaking.  (Which, for the record, I also do.)

Here, in a very interesting blog entry, Neal Rappleye looks at a closely parallel issue connected with the historicity of the biblical Exodus — along the way turning up evidence of an apparently glaring inconsistency on the part of Professor Jenkins:

http://www.studioetquoquefide.com/2015/07/the-goose-and-gander.html?m=1

Posted from Las Vegas, Nevada