
It appears that, prior to approximately 4000 BC, the Arabian peninsula was considerably wetter and greener than it is today:
This is interesting in itself.
I also note with interest, though, how the archaeologists are piecing this prehistory together: They haven’t, as a matter of fact, found the animal bones that would confirm their thesis — though their argument seems pretty solid without such tangible paleobiological evidence. Rather, they’re extrapolating from other kinds of data, inferring the necessary existence of such animals and such a different environment indirectly, from other kinds of information.
This sort of thing often occurs in studies of the distant past. And I can’t help thinking, in this regard, about arguments concerning the historicity of the Book of Mormon. The cases aren’t identical, of course. They’re quite different in many ways. But not altogether.