From the Skousen presentation (2)

From the Skousen presentation (2) January 15, 2020


Hinckley Center, BYU
BYU’s Gordon B. Hinckley Center   (Wikimedia Commons public domain image)


Learn More About Parts 5 and 6 of Volume 3 of the Critical Text Project of the Book of Mormon  [cont.]


The first chapter of part 6 will reverse the common belief among LDS people that spelling had not yet been standardized when the Book of Mormon was published in 1830. Although in the early 1800s individuals showed great variety in spelling in their own writing, typesetters had been using an informally agreed upon spelling standard for English, one that dated from Samuel Johnson’s Dictionary of the English Language, published in 1755-56. John Gilbert, the typesetter for the 1830 edition, set the type for that edition of the Book of Mormon using standardized spellings, not Oliver Cowdery’s misspellings.

In the second chapter, the error rate in spelling is measured for John Gilbert as well as for Oliver Cowdery and the other Book of Mormon scribes: John and Christian Whitmer (scribes in the original manuscript for the first part of 1 Nephi); and Martin Harris and Hyrum Smith (who accounted for about 15% of the printer’s manuscript). Oliver Cowdery was by far the best scribe. Although he was a second-rate speller, he made relatively few scribal slips, which is the crucial issue. We can also show that Oliver’s spelling improved as he proofed the 1830 typeset sheets against his manuscript copy; unlike the other scribes, he was learning how to spell better as the 1830 Book of Mormon was being printed. Martin Harris (scribe 2 of the printer’s manuscript provides a significant contrast: his spelling was actually better than Oliver Cowdery’s, but his scribal errors were extremely high and made him an unreliable scribe.  Christian Whitmer and Hyrum Smith are, on the other hand, the worst scribes, not only in their poor spelling but also in their numerous scribal slips. We are fortunate that Oliver Cowdery was the scribe for most of the original and printer’s manuscripts.

The majority of part 6 is dedicated to a complete analysis of all the nonstandard spellings in the manuscripts and the editions, organized according to sounds. For instance, under the sound /p/ the following misspellings are described (with specifications of who made them and where they were made, either in the manuscripts or in the editions):

in the manuscripts

p > pp opperation, opperate; sepparateth; uppon 
pp > p hapen, hapened; hapy; suplicate, suplication; disapointment; soposing, suposed 
non-doubling of p with endings claped, shiping, sliped, stoped, striped

in the editions

spelling variation for p ~ pp worshiped ~ worshipped, worshiping ~ worshipping, worshipers ~ worshippers

And finally, at the end of part 6, there is a complete word index for all of the misspellings and variant spellings.



"You are half-right, Professor Midgley. I have no idea how to reply to what you ..."

Quantum Physics and Early Death
"dCyl's Law: If I can suspend my disbelief in miraculous technology in a science fiction ..."

A quirky thought on scientific progress ..."
"In one of my graduate programs, I had a professor, who tried exemplify your idea ..."

A quirky thought on scientific progress ..."
"I believe that it was Arthur C. Clarke who said that a sufficiently advanced civilization's ..."

A quirky thought on scientific progress ..."

Browse Our Archives