More thoughts on the Oregon stand-off

More thoughts on the Oregon stand-off

 

What the feds own in the US
A map showing the distribution of federal lands across the United States of America
(Wikimedia CC public domain; click to enlarge)

 

I have ambivalent feelings about the Oregon stand-off.

 

I think, for example, that there are reasonable grounds for believing that federal officials have behaved far too heavy-handedly in the matter of the Hammond family and, more generally, toward the ranchers in the area.

 

And I’m not unhappy that this issue is being raised on a national level.

 

I think, though, that the brandishing of weapons in this protest has muddied the waters.

 

However, I can well understand the frustration of many citizens in dealing with overweening federal bureaucrats and impersonal government agencies.  And I can understand why rural Americans and Westerners, in particular, might feel that they’re essentially being governed by intrusive and arrogant “foreigners.”  (Consider, for example, the 2012 county-by-county presidential election map immediately below, in which blue represents Obama majorities and red represents Romney majorities, and compare it with the federal lands map above.)

 

 

County breakdown of 2012 presidential election results
2012 presidential election results, by county

(from http://www.outsidethebeltway.com)

 

 

And I worry lest Americans become too supine, too submissive to a government that is now far more expensive and far more invasive than that of King George III.

 

I hold it that a little rebellion now and then is a good thing,” Thomas Jefferson wrote to James Madison on 30 January 1787, “and as necessary in the political world as storms in the physical. . . .  An observation of this truth should render honest republican governors so mild in their punishment of rebellions, as not to discourage them too much.  It is a medecine necessary for the sound health of government.”

 

Finally, how do I feel about the Church being dragged into this matter and into the news stories about it?  Well, I’m not particularly pleased.  But I don’t know that I’m altogether upset, either.  We Mormons have the reputation of being a boring and conformist group, “white bread,” uninteresting.  But Mormonism is both theologically and socially radical, and I don’t mind the occasional reminder of that fact — for outsiders and for ourselves.  We’re not just another denomination, with an extra book.

 

Would I have joined in this action?  No.  Probably not.  And certainly not with weapons.  Am I completely without sympathy for it?  No, I’m not.

 

Here are some articles, in addition to those that I’ve already cited, that I’ve found helpful on this episode:

 

“Oregon Standoff Reveals There Is No Adult Supervision of Federal Agencies in the West”

 

On the federal prosecutor behind the Hammond case that’s behind the Bundy stand-off

 

“The Bundys’ Occupation of an Oregon Wildlife Refuge is Distasteful”

 

“The Oregon Occupation is Not Terrorism”

 

 


Browse Our Archives