I’m a great believer in peer review. I think that, although it’s not indispensable — a great piece of work remains a great piece of work whether it’s been approved by two or three peer-reviewers or not (as in the cases, for example, of Newton’s Principia, Mendel’s papers on genetics, Darwin’s Origin of Species, and Einstein’s initial article on special relativity) — it’s extremely useful, and particularly helpful to editors. But it’s not all-powerful. It wields no... Read more