These developments, if they continue, could be very interesting and could have large consequences: http://www.economist.com/news/science-and-technology/21719438-about-change-findings-medical-research-are-disseminated-too I was struck, too, by this particular passage in the article, referring to the open publishing procedure at arXiv: It does not provide formal peer review, but physicists are not shy of criticising the work of others, so a lot of informal (and un-anonymous) feedback can accumulate rapidly. This potential flak is a deterrent to publishing half-baked work. Some... Read more