Viva la Eurorévolution

Viva la Eurorévolution December 3, 2013

Religion ghosts haunt the stories out of Kiev this week, but the Western press has yet to hear their shrieks.

The events unfolding across the Ukraine — protests against the government’s move away from Europe towards Russia — are not faith stories as defined by editorial desks in London and New York, but the clash of nationalism and politics in Eastern Europe cannot be understood without reference to religion.

The Guardian‘s reporter in Kiev has described the scene on Monday morning:

Throngs of anti-government protesters remained in control of parts of central Kiev on Monday morning, as police kept their distance and Viktor Yanukovych’s government pondered its next move. After huge protests on Sunday, during which several hundred thousand people took to the streets of Kiev to call for the president’s removal, protesters erected makeshift barricades around Independence Square – the hub of the 2004 Orange Revolution. Nearby, the main City Hall building was taken over by protesters without police resistance on Sunday evening.

Many of the windows were smashed and “Revolution HQ” was daubed in black paint on its stone Stalinist facade. Inside, hundreds of people milled around receiving refreshments; many who had travelled from the regions to Kiev were sleeping on the floor.

The independent Eastern European press has characterized the street protests as a revolution.  Lviv’s Vissoki Zamok, stated that nine years after the Orange Revolution, “the Eurorevolution” was underway.

It is symbolic that on December 1, the anniversary of the referendum in favor of independence that took place 22 years ago, Ukraine was once again the theater of mass demonstrations in support of its sovereignty, the rights of its citizens and its European future.

Why is this happening? Protestors have taken to the streets to denounce President Viktor Yanukovych for refusing to sign an association and free-trade agreement with the European Union at the Eastern Partnership summit in Vilnius on November 29.

In a front page above-the-fold editorial on Monday the Parisian daily Le Monde stated:

Demonstrations of love for the European Union are sufficiently rare these days for them to be rather arresting. Absorbed by the debt crisis, the struggle for more growth and lower unemployment, the rise of populism and the management of its enlargement, the union has forgotten that it retains a formidable power of attraction. For people who do not benefit from the rule of law, Europe symbolizes the hope for freedom, democracy, and modernity.

This is the message sent to us by tens of thousands of Ukrainians who have been gathering day after day to protest on the squares of Kiev and the other cities of the country.

Reading Le Monde‘s editorial and related news coverage one might think les citoyens of Kiev were linked arm in arm marching to the seats of power singing La Marseillaise. But an American might well ask why a trade treaty would spark such an uproar. What is going on here?

It is in the secondary stories that we see glimpses of the religion ghosts. Reuters reports that when attacked by riot police, some protestors took refuge in an Orthodox cathedral and barricaded themselves inside a monastery.

Around 100 Ukrainian pro-EU protesters took refuge from police batons and biting cold on Saturday inside the walls of a central Kiev monastery. With a barricade of benches pushed up against a gate to keep police out, protesters — who had rallied against President Viktor Yanukovich’s decision to reject a pact with the European Union — checked their wounds in the pre-dawn light.

Some attended a 6 a.m. service in the lilac and gold St. Michael’s Cathedral on the monastery grounds after which a group of bearded, black-robed monks approached protesters to hear of their encounters with police and urge them not to seek revenge. “They gave us tea to warm us up, told us to keep our spirits strong and told us not to fight evil with evil,” said Roman Tsado, 25, a native of Kiev, who said police beat him on his legs as they cleared the pro-EU rally.

Further down in the story Reuters tells us what sort of church it was that gave shelter to the protestors.

The Ukrainian Orthodox cathedral, where the faithful light candles before gilded icons of saints, was destroyed during the religious purges of Soviet dictator Josef Stalin and rebuilt after independence.

What Reuters neglects to mention is which Ukrainian Orthodox church belongs to. St Michael’s belongs to the Ukrainian Orthodox Church Kiev Patriarchate — not the Ukrainian Orthodox Church Moscow Patriarchate.

What of it you might well ask. There are three principal churches in the Ukraine. One under the jurisdiction of the Russian Orthodox Church, or Moscow Patriarchate; an independent Ukrainian Orthodox Church or the Kiev Patriarchate; and the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church in full communion with the Roman Catholic Church.

And the three churches have taken differing stands on the protests, with the Kiev Patriarchate and the Greek Catholics backing the country’s realignment towards Europe, while the Moscow Patriarchate backs the president’s alignment with Vladimir Putin’s regime in Moscow.

Speaking at the Heritage Foundation in Washington last month Patriarch Filaret of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (Kiev Patriarchate) was reported to have said:

[T]he Ukrainian Churches would benefit from an Association Agreement. For one thing, it would place the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the Moscow Patriarchate (UOC-MP) in a new situation. With Ukraine committed to Europe and continued independence, that Church would have to decide which side it was on – that of Russia, or that of the Ukrainian people. By siding with Russia, the UOC-MP would assume the role of a fifth column for a hostile state. If, on the other hand, it sided with the Ukrainians, it would be obligated to unite with the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the Kyivan Patriarchate (UOC-KP) into a single Ukrainian Orthodox Church, independent of Moscow.

Statements released by the three churches in the wake of the uprising illustrate these religio-political calculations. The Kiev Patriarchate and the Greek Catholic Church have lent their support to the demonstrations — and as Reuters reports opened its churches to protestors as a safe haven from the police. The Moscow Patriarchate in Kiev has backed President Yanukovich — and its call for calm echoes the president’s public statements to date.

By raising these religion points, I am not stating the Eurorevolution is being driven by religion. I am arguing that a well rounded news report should touch upon the religion angles in this story — provide the context for a Western reader to understand.

Not all of the protestors are motivated by religious fervor. However, religion lies close below the surface of national politics east of the Oder and good reporters should relate this information to their readers.

Browse Our Archives

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment

6 responses to “Viva la Eurorévolution”

  1. Noting all the trouble that Christians are having with EU laws and regulations, the EU’s forceful demands that full abortion access be legalised and gay marriage be implemented, has the Kiev patriachate and the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church, thought clearly about why the country’s entry into the EU will actually be of any benefit to them and their people?

    This is a classic case, to me, of gaining the world but losing your soul. Ukraine, like Poland, will rapidly de-Christianise (not that this hasn’t already happened but it will accelerate) and while these two churches may get the political power they want, it will be fleeting.

    This country is already the base of FEMEN, one of the most virulently anti-Catholic and anti-Christian feminists groups on the planet – guess whose side they’re supporting?

    Are the heads of these churches thinking clearly about what they are giving their support to?

    And all because they don’t wish to be under the thumb of the Moscow patriarchate?

    They’ll get their wish, only to find themselves under the thumb of some faceless anti-theist EU bureaucrats then!

    • My point is – the reporter should not only have reported more on the religious angle but also asked why those two churches are supporting the revolution? And what do they think of them supporting the same cause as FEMEN?

    • Given that the alternative is the corrupt, violently homophobic authoritarian regime of former KGBer Vladimir Putin I think most Ukrainians know why Europe is the better choice in the long run…

  2. Another piece of this puzzle is the fact that Western Ukraine over the centuries has been part of Poland or under Polish control many times in its history and continues to have many city-dwellers of Polish extraction. Folks I know from the East say this is a big part of why the country often seems torn between East and West. I think younger reporters are not aware of the constantly changing borders of countries in that part of the world.

    And here’s an interesting summary of Christian history in Ukraine. I’m assuming it’s pretty accurate, but it does confusingly use the term “Roman Catholicism” to be the equivalent of the “Latin/Western Church”, which rather confuses the Greek Catholic Ukrainian Church’s connection to the Church of Rome.
    Later, however, they do mention that Sts. Cyril and Methodius got the go-ahead from the Bishop of Rome after running into problems with Latin clerics.

    Anyhow, that whole Eastern European area has a very mixed bag of Christian connections that is hard for folks in the West to understand – not just journalists. (speaking personally – as my ex-in-laws were from Poland)

  3. As a Brit who has spent a little time in Ukraine and found Kiev to be one of the friendliest cities on the plaet, I open my arms on behalf of the EU to say zdradsvutye to Ukraine and welcome them into the union. St Micheal’s is a great place to stage a protest if they want beutiful surroundings.

    Kiev needs to distance itself from Moscow and the Russian Patriarchate which has seriously hampered Ukranian efforts to curb the AIDs epidemic by forcing clinics to close and forcing drug users and prositutes underground thus allowing the disease to spread through the shadows.