Since my current research is not on Q, I thought that perhaps others for whom this is more their area of expertise might like to make use of some of the following puns (which I will gladly part with to the highest bidder) in posting on this subject:
- J’aQQQQQQ…Mark Goodacre
- A Qmulative Case for a Hypothetical Sayings Source
- Qrious Arguments for Luke’s Use of Matthew
- Source Criticism in Hebrew Bible and New Testament Scholarship: Minding Our Ps and Qs
- Cute Thomas Parallels
- Qpid’s Arrow: Reconciling Opposing Solutions To The Synoptic Problem
- Q-dos to Recent Spanish Scholarship on Q2
- Drinking the Q-lade: Self-Destructive Tendencies in Anti-Q Scholarship
- Thinking Outside the Qb: Innovative Solutions to the Synoptic Problem
- I’ll Be Seeing Q
- oQpational Hazards in Synoptic Scholarship
- Q Nay If Form Criticism Yea?
- Thank Q For The Music: On Hypothetical Sources and Oral Epic Folksong Traditions
- Seek and Q Will Find
- You Missed Your Q
- Q Gotta Be Kidding
- Smoking Q Bans in Michael Goulder’s Scholarship
- Conned Q Binds in Austin Farrer’s Publications
There are also ones available for those working on the Dead Sea Scrolls. Did you hear the one about the recently discovered text, 10QVeryMuch, and its hypothetical precursor, Ur-Welcome?
I don’t have any puns available for scholars working on the texts from cave 4, since I refuse to engage in profanity simply to get a few laughs.
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In