Retelling Romans 1:8-17

Retelling Romans 1:8-17 May 17, 2013

First, I give thanks to my God, through Jesus the appointed king, for all of you, because your faithfulness to God is being reported all over the world. God is my witness, whom I serve in my spirit in the good news concerning his son, as I constantly make mention of you, always asking in my prayers if now, somehow, perhaps, at long last, by God’s will, I will have a clear passage to come to you.

I am longing to see you so that I may impart a spiritual gift to you, so that you may be firmly established. No, wait – that sounds as though I think that it is only I who has something to offer you. What I mean is that I want us to mutually encourage one another in faithfulness, for both your benefit and mine.

I hope you are aware that I have intended on multiple occasions to come to you, and have always been prevented – until now, when I hope that I can finally have an impact in your midst, even as I have among the rest of the nations. I’m indebted to Greeks and barbarians, the wise and the foolish, and hence my eagerness to proclaim good news also among you in Rome.

I’m not ashamed of that good news, I’ll have you know. It is God’s power, at work to accomplish the deliverance of all the faithful – both God’s people first, and also anyone else. In it, God’s very own justice is revealed, from faithfulness to faithfulness, as it is written (in Habbakuk 2:4 – but I’m paraphrasing), “The just shall live from faithfulness.”



The only way for Christian readers to grasp the impact of one central theme of Paul’s letter, which is introduced and summed up towards the end of this section, is to place themselves in the passage. Where it says “to Jews first and to Greeks” instead read the following: “God’s power is at work to deliver all the faithful – both Christians first, and also non-Christians.” That gives a sense of how the message sounded in Paul’s time. He was taking the historical identity of God’s chosen people, Israel, and throwing the door open through his adamant claim that it could include others.

It is one of the greatest ironies that most Christian readers think that they embrace Paul’s teaching. And yet they sound more like the view Paul was opposing – an attempt to maintain a special status and salvation for a particular group, as a privilege held by them and not others.


"In an off-beat sort of a way, this reminds me of someone's line (Steve Punt, ..."

God as Parent
"When I read the title of this blog, it made me think of Stonehenge as ..."

Neolithic Robots
"I think immersive role playing is an awesome way to learn a language. I had ..."

Direct and Indirect Learning Through Games
"I never thought about it before, but Paul stressing Jesus was of David's line is ..."

Genealogies and the Age of the ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Progressive Christian
What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • Mark Matson

    Very nice final paragraph, James. I particularly like your rendition here “God’s own justice is revealed from faithfulness to faithfulness”, followed rendering the Habbakuk quote as “the just shall live from (?in) faithfulness”. I am hoping this anticipates the subjective genitive later for pistews tou Christou????

    But I think this captures the overall sentiment of “righteousness” and “faith”, and I think also the strongly universalistic tendencies in Romans.

    Can’t wait to see what you do with 1:18-2:11 (notoriously misread if you don’t included it all as one unit), and 3:21-26!! Dangerous shoals to navigate ahead indeed.

    • I am eager to get to the next section, and am thinking that it will need to be done in a longer chunk. I think I saw some angels turning around and heading in the other direction… 🙂 I have a few ideas about how to do something interesting with it, and look forward to the discussion!

  • I am longing to see you so that I may impart a spiritual gift to you, so that you may be firmly established. No, wait – that sounds as though I think that it is only I who has something to offer you.

    This was actually the most interesting for me. What does it say about Scripture that Paul would ‘correct’ himself (for lack of a better word) midstream? Obviously Paul didn’t see himself as dictating God’s Word here.

    • One can make the same point in relation to his initial insistence to the Corinthians that he hadn’t baptized anyone there except for a couple of named individuals. And then he adds Stephanus’ household. We learn at the end of the letter that Stephanus was there with Paul, and so presumably Paul wrote what he did initially, and the Stephanus himself reminded Paul that he had also baptized him and his household.