Galileo vs. Bozo

Galileo vs. Bozo July 28, 2013

On Facebook, in response to my post about the “Galileo Gambit,” Dudley Chapman recalled a saying to the effect that they laughed at Galileo and they laughed at Thomas Edison, but they also laughed at Bozo the Clown. I’ve found that quote in several places around the internet. Dudley added “The job of science is to figure out who is Edison and who is Bozo.” That may or may not be his own addition, but it makes a good point. Being laughed at can mean that you are ahead of your time or that you are ridiculous. Telling the two apart often takes hindsight, and so in the mean time, assuming that you are a genius rather than a clown is at best premature. The difference is that time proves some right. If you are right, then work on proving it.

On a related note, Jeremy Smith shared this image from a video, making a similar point: divergent thinking is not in and of itself the same thing as creativity.

"I agree that humans invented language for things. The meaning lies in us, but not ..."

Inerrancy is for Slavery
"Though to be fair, my comment about growing bored after rereading even a great book ..."

Inerrancy is for Slavery
"Great, thanks for the link! I have an essay on Nietzsche that looks like it ..."

Inerrancy is for Slavery
"You might be interested in Edgar Cantero's novel "Meddling Kids". It's a genre-flipped version of ..."

Scooby Dooby #CFP!

Browse Our Archives