Jesus and the Aliens

Jesus and the Aliens July 30, 2014

Hemant Mehta shared the image below, offering it as a response to Ken Ham’s silly remarks that we should not be looking for aliens, since they are doomed to hell because God became man and not Klingon:

wpid-Photo-20140724112523.jpg

IO9 also had a piece dealing with the range of Christian responses to the possibility of extraterrestrial life.

It is interesting to consider the narrowness of Ham’s viewpoint in historical perspective, and in view of the fact that aliens are mentioned in the Bible – aliens of a sort that have been in the news a lot lately.

The New Revised Standard Version has 134 instances of the word “alien.”  Many of them say things similar to Exodus 22:21, which reads, “You shall not wrong or oppress a resident alien, for you were aliens in the land of Egypt.”

These passages are not addressed to residents of Roswell. They are focused on how one treats people who are of other national, social, ethnic, and religious groups.

And while I would argue that such passages are not irrelevant to the kind of nonsense Ken Ham spouts, they are even more directly relevant to what is going on at the borders of the United States, and in Israel and the Palestinian territories.

Many of us were disheartened by the expressions of hatred which made the news recently, aimed at children seeking to escape extreme danger and hardship in search of a better life. And all of us – whatever our viewpoint – are surely disheartened by the conflicts in the Middle East.

In each instance, we find the commandments in the Bible about aliens being flouted by people who would claim that they are of divine origin. Muslims claim that Jewish and Christian scripture is inspired, and not only the Qur’an. And yet militants who claim to be Muslims ignore the teachings of both the Bible and the Qur’an when they attack Christians and other people of the book living in their midst. Israelis who can find no way to give citizenship and freedom of movement to people in land that they have occupied are likewise ignoring the Bible’s commands. So too are people who consider themselves Christians and treat aliens among them with contempt.

The Bible is not a panacea for problems like war and immigration. But it is certainly worth highlighting when people who claim to adhere to a particular text’s values are behaving as though they did not.

Leviticus 19:34 says, “The alien who resides with you shall be to you as the citizen among you; you shall love the alien as yourself, for you were aliens in the land of Egypt: I am the Lord your God.”

How might the situation in Israel change if that were taken seriously? How might Americans along the border with Mexico behave differently if that were taken seriously?

I suspect that if more Jews, Christians, and Muslims took what the Bible and other authoritative sources in their tradition say about this subject, it would at least help lessen the intransigence we are currently seeing.

And if that happened, then presumably if even non-human aliens showed up in our midst, we might be able to welcome them better than Ken Ham is currently recommending.

"Walmart does this with lots of items. They also tack on a few extra cents ..."

Taxing Water
"The meme is clearly addressing the penchant for conservatives to claim that acceptance of mainstream ..."

Not Liberal, Just Literate
"The meme itself suggested that liberals were scientifically literate. They certainly aren't, when it comes ..."

Not Liberal, Just Literate
"Sorry, who are you addressing here? How does your comment relate to the meme, the ..."

Not Liberal, Just Literate

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


TRENDING AT PATHEOS Progressive Christian
What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • GakuseiDon

    “… Ken Ham’s silly remarks that we should not be looking for aliens, since they are doomed to hell because God became man and not Klingon”

    The problem is that Ken Ham did not say that, even if that can be partly inferred from his remarks. The statement above was given taken from the headline of a Huffington Post article. Ken Ham responds here: http://blogs.answersingenesis.org/blogs/ken-ham/2014/07/22/huffington-post-admits-its-site-was-always-meant-to-be-fiction/

    I’m not a fan of Ken Ham in particular or of creationism in general, but having had my own words distorted many times in the past, I think it is important to be careful when quoting those we disagree with, esp comments from a news site headline!

      • Spiggity Spike

        Ham said we shouldn’t check for alien life because there can’t be any out there. There can’t be any out there because Jesus died for humans only.

        But you said Ham said we shouldn’t check for alien life because they are doomed to Hell.

        The crucial difference:

        Ham said IF there were aliens, they WOULD be doomed to hell (but there aren’t any aliens, precisely because of this).

        You said Ham said that the aliens ARE doomed to hell. Your phrasing implies that there ARE aliens.

        So it might be that you miscommunicated–you may have only unintentionally ascribed to Ham the view that aliens ARE doomed to hell when he actually only said that aliens WOULD be doomed to hell. (BTW he doesn’t actually even think that–he thinks aliens would be doomed to destruction.)

        Or else it might be that you misunderstood–you may have actually thought Ham thinks aliens ARE doomed to hell.

        Ham’s an idiot, though.

      • GakuseiDon

        Ken Ham writes “… I do believe there can’t be other intelligent beings in outer space because of the meaning of the gospel”. So he isn’t saying that we shouldn’t be looking for aliens since they are doomed to hell; but rather that he is “shocked at the countless hundreds of millions of dollars spent over the years in the desperate and fruitless search for
        extraterrestrial life”. He thinks alien life doesn’t exist so we shouldn’t be spending so much on looking for aliens.

        Ham is still being very silly for using the Bible to speculate on the existence of aliens; but he should be criticized on that. It makes it easier for him to deflect good criticism otherwise.

  • BrotherRog

    The Bible actually tells us that God sent Jesus to save creatures who may live on other planets. John’s Gospel says “For God so loved the cosmos that he sent his only begotten son….” Understandably, that Greek word, “cosmos” is typically translated as “the world” or “the earth” – but it actually means all of Creation, the entire created order; i.e., the whole universe.

    Roger Wolsey, “Kissing Fish: christianity for people who don’t like christianity”