Neolithic Robots

Neolithic Robots September 19, 2019

As someone who is fascinated by new technology, including robots, and who thinks that ancient technologies now taken for granted have a lot to teach us about the present and future when it comes to the current and potential impact of new technologies, this article about the impact of oxen in the ancient world fascinated me. Here’s a lengthy excerpt:

If it sounds silly today to lament that oxen were taking the jobs of people 7,000 years ago, it is easy to see why robot concerns are equally mundane. Human progress did not collapse due to oxen, food instead became cheaper and when that basic necessity was met we got written language and then art and culture.

Agriculture did not create inequality – it’s instead what kept things equal for so long

Oxen displaced human workers, so they brought economic inequality. When all people worked in the field or in hunting, there was no economic weight to any individual.  The labor of one person might be more than another, but not enough to change economies. Yet an ox allowed one person to work 10X as much land, which made the land and the ox the asset. If you didn’t have those, you were a have not economically. By the time the Assyrians had a giant army to feed, agriculture was booming and people who didn’t own the oxen managed them, or built stuff for people who owned them. But the steep increase in inequality in Eurasia was much earlier, around 4,000 BC — and that was several millennia after the advent of agriculture.

“The surprise here isn’t so much that inequality takes off later on, it’s that it stayed low for such a long time,” says lead author Amy Bogaard, an archaeologist based at the University of Oxford who is also an external professor at the Santa Fe Institute.

“The usual story — that the societies that adopted agriculture became more unequal — is no longer valid because we observed that some societies who adopted agriculture were remarkably egalitarian for thousands of years,” says co-author Mattia Fochesato, an economist at Bocconi University.

Before around 4,000 BC, societies across the Middle East and Europe cultivated a patchwork of small garden plots, which Bogaard likens to present-day “allotments” in the UK. Families would have grown a variety cereal grains, as well as lentils, peas, and other pulse crops that needed to be harvested by hand. Notably, they would have tilled the soil by hand using hoes, in some cases also with the help of unspecialized cattle (such as aging milk cows) to pull plows, and carefully monitored their gardens during the growing season to protect them from wild animals. “It was quite a busy landscape, with lots of people working in and around these garden plots.”

Then something changed. Farmers who were well resourced enough to raise and maintain specialized plow oxen saw new opportunities in farming additional land. A single farmer with an ox team could cultivate ten times or more land than a hoe farmer, and would begin to acquire more and more land to cultivate. Those who owned land and ox teams also began to opt for more stress-tolerant crops, like barley or certain kinds of wheat, that didn’t require much labor.

By the second millennium BC in many farming landscapes fields stretched to the horizon, and societies were deeply divided between wealthy landowners, who passed their holdings on to their children, and land-poor or landless families.

Do read the whole thing, and perhaps also the related piece from EurekAlert. And then share your thoughts on how this might help to highlight parallels between ancient and modern advocates for social and economic justice. Also worthy of reflection is whether we’d notice more similarities and parallels like this, and learn more from them, if more people studied both the ancient world and science fiction…

Of related interest: “Let Skynet deal with invasive species.” And a call for papers:

https://relcfp.tumblr.com/post/187756332825/cfp-fourth-posthuman-global-symposium-posthuman

"I just wanted to share this blurb about the movie:THE DIVINE PLAN: REAGAN, JOHN PAUL ..."

ReligionProf Podcast with Rob Orlando (and ..."
"This essay is a good argument for eliminating the federal control of public and private ..."

Manufacturing Conflict
"This timeline gives a sense of how the climate has changed over time: https://xkcd.com/1732/"

Not Liberal, Just Literate
"The evidence indicates that the climate has been changing for several billion years. The evidence ..."

Not Liberal, Just Literate

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


TRENDING AT PATHEOS Progressive Christian
What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • When I read the title of this blog, it made me think of Stonehenge as an inert circle of ancient robots.

  • John MacDonald

    I am a firm believer in Cognitive Science and the AI project. I don’t believe in a soul, so I think the mental/emotional/etc level of description completely reduces to material things at the brain/body level of description. I think one day we will achieve intelligent AI at the level of Star Trek’s Data, and eventually intelligent/emotional AI at the level of Lore. It’s interesting that the more fully developed level of AI (Lore) is what I would consider inferior when compared to Data.