Most of us have watched in horror and dismay as a small handful of people have spun conspiracy theories around the tragic shooting in Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut.ย Andii Bowsher has noted the connection with another sort of denialism, that which one encounters in Biblical studies. Andii quotes an article fromย The Guardian which I think is worth quoting at even greater length:
The point is that when you freeze any moment of history, then analyse it in extreme detail, youโll always find numerous things that โdonโt add upโ. Every moment in history is full of them; itโs just that most moments in history are mundane, and therefore go un-analysed.
And โif you have any fact which you think is really sinister โฆ hey, forget it, man,โ Tink Thompson, a private detective who investigated the case, tells Morris. โBecause you can never, on your own, think up all the non-sinister, perfectly valid explanations for that fact.โ
In short: itโs not that the alleged Sandy Hook โdiscrepanciesโ are necessarily fabrications in need of debunking. Itโs simply that any brief span of time, probed in sufficient detail, will be found to contain plenty of them: the changing witness reports and reports about the weapons involved; theย quote in the newspaper, purportedly from the school principalย who had, in fact, been killed; theย seemingly strange lack of recordsย concerning the recent life of Adam Lanza. And the overwhelming likelihood is that they signifyย nothing at all.
Sandy Hook trutherism is unforgivable, but the essential fallacy on which it rests โ that facts we canโt account for must have a sinister explanation โ is a widespread, human and dangerously seductive one. Thereโs much about last monthโs tragedy in Connecticut that defies the search for meaning. Confronting that truth, even for those of us who are just onlookers, is hard. So itโs depressing, but not exactly surprising, that the Sandy Hook โtruthersโ canโt bring themselves to do so.
The parallels to other sorts of โtrutherismโ โ including but not limited to Jesus mythicism โ are strikingly obvious.
Of related interest, Jeff Carter has blogged about reading Meierโs A Marginal Jew.