Why I’m Not Too Worked Up About Common Core

Why I’m Not Too Worked Up About Common Core November 21, 2013

The history of compulsory schooling in the United States resembles the political history of Latin America, only its successes are fewer and shorter-lived. It is replete with failure, reform, reform of the reform, and more failed reform.

From the Common School Movement in the 1830’s, founded by Horace Mann, to the Common Core of today, there are identical language and themes along with unrealized and misguided aspirations throughout.

If you look at the reforms stretching from National Defense Act of 1957 and the Nation at Risk Report of 1983 to the more recent ones of No Child Left Behind in 2003 and Race to the Top in 2010, you will see what Ralph Ellison describes in the preface to Invisible Man: “mirrors of hard distorting glass.”

Common Core is no different.


If you look deeper, into the policy feeding tubes called “educational research,” you will find a large trough of social science, funded by grants that drive most major universities wild and loopy, all of them with a four to five year expiration dates. Maximum. Increasingly, post-positivistic psychological studies that mimic much of the ideas of the previous behaviorist dog training are in vogue.

This work depends on cheap, brittle, and ill-fitted “theory,” as a “conceptual framework,” and most of the theorists cited are theorizing about theories about other theories. These layers of theory and data and findings and prescriptions are built into a formulaic sandwich pile of research that is as dreadful to read as it sounds. What is most scary about this repetitive and profitable work, that often relies on epistemological assumptions that are outdated in more rigorous fields of study, is that it is being fed in bulk to children and parents and the public at large. And we never talk about reforming “educational research;” it speaks, so long as it is well funded, autocratically.

Add to that the publishers of textbooks, key among them Pearson, and other interested entities, like Sodexo, who poison feed children cheap shit to eat at lunchtime.

It is hard not to include here the entire professionalized class of school workers — including myself, a bonafide Gates Millennium Scholar — who range from counselors and social workers and therapists and Adderall prescribers to teachers and specialists and administrators and policy makers and technologists and smart boards and security cameras and more.


Home, private, and charter schoolers are not excluded from this list. More and more, assumptions about schooling are monolithic and the exceptions are just that. The differences are, with very few exceptions, cosmetic.

The utopian modern vision of compulsory common schooling, imported from Prussia in the 19th century, has never been realized, but it seems to increase in influence even as it is declared to be a failure by every successive generation since.

No one, from right to left, thinks that schooling is doing good on a large scale. Republicans and Democrats agree that schooling is a disaster. One side thinks we should give up the public project entirely, the other side thinks we should to adopt a truly public project for the first time. Each side seems to think that the other side is ruining everything and, in this respect, they are both absolutely correct.


Schooling has never been the same thing as education, but today’s iteration of schooling has become aggressively miseducative.

The first confusion is that we have given up on education and replaced it with a very limited notion of schooling. This confusion has resulted in the idea that “education” is about getting credentials and suitable work and, ultimately, money. The surest sign of a good school and an educated person and rancid success, we’ve tricked ourselves into thinking and feeling, is the one that produces the biggest paycheck.

This is an outright lie. There are more concrete contradictions to this logic than I care to mention here, but the lie has become a powerful and disastrous logic of its own.


So what do I think about Common Core? It’s bad. Not all bad. Nothing bad is all bad. The worst things have a nice personality, a charming smile. Altruism is very hard to root against.

But I find it impossible to get worked up about the Common Core which is, after all, another repetition of the last new idea and the one before that. The standards movement started a long, long time ago and teachers have never really had the agency we think they had and students have never been the most important things to schools. It’s all a matter of diminishing returns, in every direction.

Perhaps the greatest reformers of today are the drop outs and losers and the poor who refuse this message of schoolvation, even as they pay and suffer for it dearly.

The ruling classes have been, for the most part, educated in the same traditional way, in many of the same traditional schools that predate compulsory schools, for centuries. Meanwhile, the rest of us crack our heads trying to figure out how to learn basic skills that becomes more and more automated and basic as our lives degrade into Miley Cyrus and glowing rectangles.


The narrative that schooling isn’t working is a seductive lie. Modern compulsory schooling is working exactly the way it was built to work by the secular, colonial project of the modern West. All these so-called “problems” are like war: they require weaponry and create jobs and something to do and be mad about.

If you continue to believe in the nearly 200 year-old need to institutionalize human beings to produce a docile, domesticated class of sedate, productive, and self-protected candidates for economic actualization, things like school choice or democratic pedagogy — or education itself — don’t matter.

And that is why I am not too worked up about the Common Core.

I won’t get too worked up about whatever replaces it, either.



"As another Professor and Doctor of Philosophy wrote, albeit somewhat hyperbolically, in First Things a ..."

By Their Fruits: A Reply to ..."
""...ready to save it by penning a bestseller." Bwahaha!"

By Their Fruits: A Reply to ..."
"You're more gracious to Rod than he deserves in this case. What a snit fit. ..."

Notes In Defense of Rod Dreher
"Thank you for this exposition. I have read articles by him in which he explains ..."

The Benedict Option: A Critical Review

Browse Our Archives

Close Ad