January 24, 2014

To reject Dr. Marshall’s approach (i.e., the Beatles are "intellectual poison" and "straight-up evil") does not mean one should approve of every­thing an artist cre­ates. Nor does it mean we should deny that truly wicked cra­dles of filth do exist in pop cul­ture and dis­guise them­selves as art. Filth ought to be exposed. But to do that, with fair­ness and depth, means that we start by ask­ing what the artist is try­ing to do. It means we ana­lyze with dis­cern­ment and dis­cre­tion. It means we admit that many things we might dis­like, or dis­agree with, or find bane­ful, do have real artis­tic value that should be under­stood rightly. It means we know that just because some artist was a wretch of a human being does not mean that what he cre­ated has no merit worth our praise. [Read more] Read more

January 23, 2014

If lightning strikes a tree, how do we know that it is ran­dom; whereas, if light­ning strikes an image of Christ, that is God’s judg­ment against idol­a­try? Per­haps Mr. X will say that even the tree was not struck ran­domly, and that its destruc­tion was ordained. But surely God is not blast­ing with judg­ment every tree that gets struck. No, Mr. X might say, but God does have a pur­pose in strik­ing the tree, though we may not dis­cern it. Nev­er­the­less, Mr. X believes he can dis­cern the pur­pose of God when the image of Jesus is struck. Read more

January 20, 2014

Steve "Purple" Hays, at Failablogue has proposed the following argument regarding sola scriptura: It is not in the Bible, but that should not worry us, for no one should expect to find it in the Bible. Instead, sola scriptura simply is the Bible. Mr. Hays seems to think this kind of argument is checkmate for Catholic apologists. Rather, it may be the most desperate one yet. In this article, I explain why it matters that Catholics keep asking the question, "Where is sola scriptura in the Bible?" Read more

January 20, 2014

With all the so-called shock­ing quo­ta­tions from the pope, which have been mak­ing a mad cir­cu­la­tion through the blogs, would it not be nice to have access to a col­lec­tion of the Holy Father’s words that the front pages and head­line news have ignored? Just this week­end, I received a won­der­ful lit­tle vol­ume that does just that. Through the Year With Pope Fran­cis is a daily devo­tional of 365 quo­ta­tions, mainly from his hom­i­lies and Gen­eral Audi­ences. Read more

January 17, 2014

Computer crashes helped me regain my sanity about how to write. The vile Dell off, and pen in hand, I can focus on words to the exclu­sion of all else. And it feels more like writ­ing, to me, when I can have a tac­tile con­nec­tion to a phys­i­cal object. I can hold a pen. I can shake it, tap it onto the page or my head to dredge a thought, or bite it to mull. It feels more like I am writ­ing when I can look at a page and scratch out. Read more

January 16, 2014

Protes­tant apol­o­gists are cre­ative and tire­less in their efforts to find sola scrip­tura in the Bible. They are undaunted by refu­ta­tion. When told that Acts 17:11, or 2 Tim­o­thy 3:16, do not sup­port the doc­trine, they do not attempt fur­ther defense; they sim­ply move on to the next verse. In this way, per­haps Catholics could, in time, get them to run the cir­cuit through every last one. That would be one way to have fun with our separated brethren. Read more

January 13, 2014

Is the infamous "butcher cover" of Yesterday and Today an intent, on the part of The Beatles, to promote abortion? Or is there a different, more innocent explanation? In this article, I take a look at a recent blog post by Dr. Taylor Marshall (expert textpert or elementary penguin?) in order to illustrate the right way, and the wrong way, for Catholics to approach the arts. To accuse the Beatles of being "intellectual poison" and "straight-up evil" based on noth­ing other than ini­tial gut reac­tion that some­thing is “gross” or “kinda weird” does noth­ing to pro­mote a Catholic under­stand­ing of or con­tri­bu­tion to the arts. In fact, it com­pro­mises it. Our first obligation is to figure out what the artist was actually up to, not to impose our own agendas upon his work. [Read more] Read more

January 3, 2014

It is a New Year, and with every new year come the inevitable res­o­lu­tions. The rea­son peo­ple make res­o­lu­tions at the start of a new year is because last year’s res­o­lu­tions failed. Some use that as an excuse not to make res­o­lu­tions: If I’m not going to keep them, why make them? That sounds like a hard-earned wis­dom, but the same logic applies in the con­fes­sional. Who says, “I do not firmly resolve with the help of thy grace, because I have made these res­o­lu­tions before"? Read more

December 21, 2013

"Let it be to me accord­ing to your word.” That is not just an incred­i­ble act of com­plete humil­ity and obe­di­ence, but it is an act of almost unimag­in­able sur­ren­der. If Mary was found with child out of mar­riage, by the law of Israel she could be stoned. And she could have said no, and avoided all that. Instead she said “Fiat,” being under no mis­un­der­stand­ing about what that word could have meant to her, yet trust­ing fully in the God who sent His archangel. Read more

December 14, 2013

Come, thou long-expected Jesus! It is hard, and seems more than impos­si­ble, to be Advent peo­ple in a cul­ture of instant grat­i­fi­ca­tion. We rush to the Christ­mas music before it’s even Advent, let alone Christ­mas; and I want to scream every time I hear “What Child is This” when it’s still Ordi­nary Time. But all this is more than just a defi­cient under­stand­ing of the liturgical year. It is a defi­cient under­stand­ing of time itself — that is, an inabil­ity to rest in the instant. Read more


Browse Our Archives