The kind of repentance for the forgiveness of sins that the Lukan community embraced had a quality that began with John the Baptist in Luke 3. John’s repentance was not for personal, private, individual sins. John called his listeners to a repentance for community sins, social and political choices, that were not only making the most marginalized vulnerable to harm, but also being the conduits of that harm as well. The elite, the powerful, propertied, and privileged, had become complicit with the Roman empire’s exploitation and extraction of the masses in Galilee, Samaria, and Judea. John then came, echoing the Hebrew prophets, calling for national repentance for national sins in the hopes that the people would experience national forgiveness. Remember, this forgiveness was to start in Jerusalem and go to the end of the world.
Welcome Readers! Please subscribe to Social Jesus Here.
Part 3 of Carrying on the Work of Love and Justice
(Read this series from the beginning at Part 1 and Part 2.)
In the Hebrew scriptures, forgiveness did not mean being allowed to go to heaven when one dies. It meant liberation from oppression here on earth, violence being replaced with safety and peace, and injustice giving way to compassion and equity. It meant social healing, not private, personal, individual benefit that was separate from everyone else.
Consider how forgiveness is treated in the books of Chronicles:
“If my people, who are called by my name, will humble themselves and pray and seek my face and turn from their wicked ways [repent], then I will hear from heaven, and I will forgive their sin and will heal their land.”
That forgiveness isn’t connected to a post mortem destination later, but to healing of their land in this life, and it was not simply for Judea, Samaria, and Galilee, but also for the entire world.
A more vernacular way of describing the “healing of the land” today would be to speak of societal healing. This healing was to live on in the lives of the Jesus followers who would now carry on the work of shaping our world into a safe, compassionate, just home for everyone. Three components of that work are worth singling out today.
The first is Jesus’ emphasis on community. In the Jewish language of the 1st Century, the gospels refer to community as “the kingdom.” While the label of “kingdom” is problematic for us today, for Jesus in the gospels, it meant a community where the reign of love and compassion dictated our societal decisions. It was a society where love and compassion governed the distribution of resources with the hope of being distributively just. (See the stories at the beginning of the book of Acts.)
The second is that the heart of this community was the value of those presently being socially marginalized and excluded. Liberation theologians refer to this as a “preferential option for the poor.” The ethic of prioritizing those being marginalized begins with the poor and today should also include those excluded because of race, gender, orientation, culture, education, and more. Any time someone is being marginalized, scapegoated, or pushed to the undersides and edges of our collective life together, Jesus’ teachings call us to prioritize that group to restore equity. In the gospels, Jesus’ God loves all people equally. That love should lead us to have a unique concern for the distinct needs of all who are marginalized.
And third, Jesus’ teachings were much more than a list of things to believe. Jesus taught his followers how to live. His teachings weren’t ways to gain the favor of a divine being or gain entrance into paradise. They were ways to live in response to the immense suffering of those around them. Consider these words from Jesus-following communities carrying on his teachings:
“What good is it, my brothers and sisters, if you say you have faith but do not have works? Can faith save you? If a brother or sister is naked and lacks daily food, and one of you says to them, “Go in peace; keep warm and eat your fill,” and yet you do not supply their bodily needs, what is the good of that? So faith by itself, if it has no works, is dead.” (James 2:14-17).
“If anyone has material possessions and sees a brother or sister in need but has no pity on them, how can the love of God be in that person?” (1 John 3:17)
Notice these actions were not centered around a debate of personal piety. They were in response the material needs of those around them. Faith without works of justice was worth nothing. A gospel without social implications was to be deeply questioned and rejected.
This gives Jesus followers today much to ponder. Are we seeking to make our world a better place for all or are the lives of those who are different from us less safe and just because of our actions? If we don’t start here, anything more is pointless.
Are you receiving all of RHM’s free resources each week?
Begin each day being inspired toward love, compassion, justice and action. Free.
Sign up at HERE.
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In