Modesty and the Pornographic Gaze

Modesty and the Pornographic Gaze May 2, 2016

There is a pretty, sensual young woman sitting in that room, and she is completely naked. Never mind how she got naked in the first place. She is naked and helpless and under your control. What do you do? Do you feel tempted? Do you rage at her for being that way, for tempting you? Do you take off your own clothes? Do you stare at her? Kiss her? Rape her? Do you take off your jacket and give it to her to wear? Do you make eye contact and gaze at her, one human being to another? Do you lead her from the room? You could. You have the potential to do any of these things. The difference is in your disposition and your gaze.

You cannot always help your ignorance. Sometimes you can, and when you can you should. You cannot always help your hormone levels, your sex drive, and what kind of temptations flash before your mind. Sometimes you can. You usually can’t help what information flashes before your eyes, whether it’s a painted icon or a pornographic magazine cover or a woman wearing spaghetti straps to Mass. Pornographic photos shouldn’t exist, and people should remember it is polite to wear clothes that cover their shoulders at Mass, but you can’t always help running into that sort of thing. But what is under your control, is your gaze. Your sin, or your act of virtue, does not depend on spaghetti straps worn by somebody else. Your sin, and your act of virtue, are in your own gaze first before they’re in your actions. First you dispose yourself to gaze with the eyes of your soul. Then you see with the senses of your body or the conjuring of your psyche. Then you gaze, and then you act. To commit adultery in the heart is to commit adultery indeed, before you’ve done it with your body and whether you’re successful in doing so at all. We have that on the authority of a much wiser One than I. To gaze upon all of creation, and on your Neighbor in particular, with the pornographic gaze– with a disposition of superiority, of being one who has no responsibility toward them, of being entitled to use another rather than having reverence for them– is sin. To gaze upon all of creation with reverence and openness is virtue, and from that virtuous gaze, virtuous acts naturally follow. You can be tempted to every sexual sin imaginable, but if you gaze upon your neighbor with true love and reverence, you won’t commit any sin against her. Even if she’s being immodest.

Does that mean we have no responsibility to be modest? Of course not. If I gaze upon my neighbor with reverence, I’ll do what I can to help him avoid temptation. I’ll cover my shoulders at Mass, and I’ll probably choose the one-piece bathing suit. I may even choose to wear shorts with my bathing suit, if I know I’ll be in the company of someone who’s particularly tempted to sexual sin. But if my neighbor gazes upon me with pornographic eyes, nothing I do will help him not to sin. Even if I wore a burqa or an old fashioned nun’s habit, I would still be a pornographic object to him, because he made me one by his gaze. He violates me by his gaze, and by that same gaze he violates himself. I am a child of God, and so is he. But by his gaze, he makes himself dirty and he involves me, against my will, in his dirty sin. And of course, in the dirty and pornographic mind, this is somehow my fault for existing as a sexual being in the wrong attire. No matter what my attire is, he’ll make an excuse. Of course he feels that I tempted him. Because, in the pornographic gaze, all objects are transformed into objects that are doing something to the beholder. The pornographic mind believes that a drunk woman forced him to rape her, and that he’s entitled to fantasize about a woman in a long skirt and chapel veil instead of keeping his mind on his prayers. This a logical progression of thought. And it’s a sin.

Virtue demands a different logic. Virtue demands that we gaze upon one another as icons, and then do whatever our reverence demands of us, whether it’s making eye contact or sacrificing our lives as martyrs of charity. Modesty is not only one side of the coin; modesty is a small function of a much larger whole, and the whole begins with the proper gaze.

(Image courtesy of Wikimedia Commons)

"There was an interesting take on the subject by Stephen Colbert on an interview with ..."

No, Suffering is Not Good
"I really appreciate your compassion and attention given to the tragedy of addiction. I want ..."

Addiction Doesn’t Discriminate (And Neither Should ..."
"I guess the problems I might have with this isOne: Many of the early Christians, ..."

No, Suffering is Not Good
"I would normally delete a comment like this, but I'm keeping it up as a ..."

Addiction Doesn’t Discriminate (And Neither Should ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment