Ex-Trump World Tower Doorman Adds to the Week’s Mountain of Trump Dirt

Ex-Trump World Tower Doorman Adds to the Week’s Mountain of Trump Dirt August 25, 2018

One by one, the closet doors in Trump Tower are swinging open, and they all seem to be filled with the nastiest skeletons.

Did we say this has been an awful week for President Trump?

It’s not over.

So first, Trump is hit with his former campaign chairman, Paul Manafort, being found guilty of eight felony charges in court.

On the same day, his longtime attorney and “fixer,” Michael Cohen entered guilty pleas on a number of charges involving wire fraud, bank fraud, tax fraud, and campaign finance law violations. Those campaign finance law violations involved the payoff of Trump’s former mistresses – porn star, Stormy Daniels, and Playboy model, Karen McDougal.

No longer willing to “take a bullet” for Donald Trump, Cohen, under oath, pointed the finger at Donald Trump as the director of those actions to violate campaign finance laws.

It’s not like Trump could get away from it. Cohen has audio of a conversation where he and his client discussed the payoffs, and how they would be made.

E-V-I-D-E-N-C-E.

And while President Trump took to Twitter to rant and froth, praising Manafort for remaining “loyal,” like a properly steeped mob associate, he referred to Cohen as a “rat.”

It seems there are plenty of rats bailing from the Good Ship President BestWords, these days.

It caused quite the rumble to find that American Media, Inc. CEO and Trump pal, David Pecker, had signed an immunity deal with prosecutors in Cohen’s case.

Pecker, through his tabloid magazine, the National Enquirer, it seems, is complicit in helping bury “inconvenient” stories, regarding Trump, his children, and even his wives, according to reports.

Pecker’s company, AMI, would purchase the exclusive rights to a story, then never release the story publicly. It’s a move called “catch and kill.” As it pertains to Donald Trump, reports are that he coordinated with Michael Cohen as far back as a decade on having the catch and kill contracts written up and payments made.

There is even talk of a safe, where Pecker kept all of Trump’s catch and kill contracts, along with those of other celebrities.

On Friday, news broke of the Trump Organization’s chief financial officer, Allen Weisselberg, also making an immunity agreement with prosecutors in Cohen’s case, and that may have been the topper to what was an incredibly damaging week for President Trump.

Weisselberg, along with Trump sons, Donald Jr. and Eric, was left in control of Trump’s business interests when Trump became president.

Trump could likely survive Paul Manafort’s conviction. There’s even some rumors that he plans to pardon him, as payment for his “loyalty.”

And I need to point out, those things that Manafort was found guilty of had nothing to do with Trump. For Trump to praise him for his loyalty, would that not suggest that Manafort (who volunteered to work as Trump’s chairman for free, for some curious reason) proved that “loyalty” by not offering to tell what he knows, in exchange for a lighter sentence?

Trump really is his own worst enemy.

Also, Trump could conceivably make it through Cohen’s troublesome turn.

It becomes considerably less likely that with a flip from both David Pecker and Allen Weisselberg that Trump slides by, completely unscathed.

So with all that, you’d think the pile on was complete.

Not quite. There’s another nugget of salacious information that slipped under the gate on Friday evening, and it piggybacks on the news about Pecker.

So back to those catch and kill deals…

This particular story is one that has been floating around for possibly a year, but it was quickly snuffed out. Now we may know why.

With David Pecker rolling on his old pal, some of those caught and killed stories are being freed up for the public.

One involves a former doorman at Trump World Tower, by the name of Dino Sajudin.

Sajudin’s attorney, Marc Held, announced on Friday that his client had been involved in a contract with Pecker’s AMI, under strict terms, but had “recently” been freed from that contract, so he’s in a position to talk.

Remember all the tabloid fuss when it was discovered that Arnold Schwarzenegger had a son by an illicit relationship with a housekeeper?

Yeah. Apparently, that’s a thing.

The contract appears to have been signed on Nov. 15, 2015, and states that AMI has exclusive rights to Sajudin’s story but does not mention the details of the story itself beyond saying, “Source shall provide AMI with information regarding Donald Trump’s illegitimate child…”

The contract states that “AMI will not owe Source any compensation if AMI does not publish the Exclusive…” and the top of the agreement shows that Sajudin could receive a sum of $30,000 “payable upon publication as set forth below.”

But the third page of the agreement shows that about a month later, the parties signed an amendment that states that Sajudin would be paid $30,000 within five days of receiving the amendment. It says the “exclusivity period” laid out in the agreement “is extended in perpetuity and shall not expire.”

So what did Sajudin know?

According to what he’s now free to talk about, the evangelicals’ most revered president impregnated a former housekeeper, and there’s an illegitimate Trump heir out there, somewhere.

Under the previous conditions of Sajudin’s contract with AMI, if he were to breach the contract and reveal his story, he would be under a $1 million penalty.

In April, Sajudin told CNN he claims to have knowledge of a relationship Trump had with his former housekeeper that resulted in a child.

At the time, AMI called Sajudin’s story “not credible” and denied any connection between the story and Trump and his then-personal attorney Michael Cohen.

I should interject here that no housekeeper has stepped forward, held up her weak-chinned, orange-hued child and declared him or her the spawn of Trump. All we know is that AMI was willing to pay Sajudin $30,000 back in November 2015 – five months after Trump announced his run for the presidency – for a story they once said was “not credible.”

Does that seem like a sound business model to anybody?

Back in April, Sajudin gave this statement to CNN:

“Today I awoke to learn that a confidential agreement that I had with AMI (The National Enquirer) with regard to a story about President Trump was leaked to the press. I can confirm that while working at Trump World Tower I was instructed not to criticize President Trump’s former housekeeper due to a prior relationship she had with President Trump, which produced a child.”

Well, there you go.

Until this housekeeper steps forward, we’ll just have to use discernment, based on what we know, to determine the veracity of Sajudin’s story.

Also, with Pecker’s flip, can we expect more dirt, in the coming days?


Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!